RSINX vs. QCGDX
RSINX (Victory RS Investors Fund) and QCGDX (Quantified Common Ground Fund) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, RSINX returned 11.69%/yr vs 7.37%/yr for QCGDX. Their 0.71 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. RSINX charges 1.33%/yr vs 1.68%/yr for QCGDX.
Performance
RSINX vs. QCGDX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RSINX achieves a 14.37% return, which is significantly higher than QCGDX's 10.59% return.
RSINX
- 1D
- 2.11%
- 1M
- 4.78%
- 6M
- 10.55%
- YTD
- 14.37%
- 1Y
- 23.67%
- 3Y*
- 15.63%
- 5Y*
- 11.69%
- 10Y*
- 10.87%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.67%
QCGDX
- 1D
- 2.98%
- 1M
- -0.60%
- 6M
- 7.23%
- YTD
- 10.59%
- 1Y
- 14.86%
- 3Y*
- 8.67%
- 5Y*
- 7.37%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 10.03%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
RSINX vs. QCGDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RSINX Victory RS Investors Fund | 14.37% | 6.39% | 20.81% | 13.18% | -2.02% | 25.73% | -1.68% | 0.23% |
QCGDX Quantified Common Ground Fund | 10.59% | 1.02% | 9.87% | 14.74% | -12.23% | 32.19% | 14.65% | 0.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between RSINX and QCGDX is 0.50, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.50 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.67 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 30, 2019 | 0.71 |
Over the past year, the correlation between RSINX and QCGDX has dropped to 0.50 - well below their long-term average of 0.71, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RSINX vs. QCGDX — Risk / Return Rank
RSINX
QCGDX
RSINX vs. QCGDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Victory RS Investors Fund (RSINX) and Quantified Common Ground Fund (QCGDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RSINX | QCGDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.78 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.18 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.42 | 1.57 | +0.85 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.76 | 5.84 | +2.92 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RSINX vs. QCGDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RSINX drawdown since its inception was -66.11%, which is greater than QCGDX's maximum drawdown of -22.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSINX and QCGDX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RSINX | QCGDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -66.11% | -22.37% | -43.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.64% | -9.38% | +0.74% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.23% | -16.10% | -4.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.08% | -20.18% | -2.90% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.86% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -6.69% | +6.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.49% | -6.09% | -4.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.39% | 2.51% | -0.12% |
Volatility
RSINX vs. QCGDX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Victory RS Investors Fund (RSINX) is 3.43%, while Quantified Common Ground Fund (QCGDX) has a volatility of 6.32%. This indicates that RSINX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QCGDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RSINX | QCGDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.43% | 6.32% | -2.89% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.15% | 13.27% | -5.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.03% | 15.29% | -3.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.99% | 15.17% | +3.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.06% | 16.73% | +2.33% |
RSINX vs. QCGDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
RSINX has a 1.33% expense ratio, which is lower than QCGDX's 1.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
RSINX vs. QCGDX - Dividend Comparison
RSINX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.90%, more than QCGDX's 0.63% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QCGDX Quantified Common Ground Fund | 0.63% | 0.69% | 4.42% | 0.22% | 0.00% | 5.44% | 1.65% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RSINX Victory RS Investors Fund | 3.90% | 4.46% | 10.21% | 0.77% | 4.03% | 15.89% | 0.30% | 4.32% | 17.89% | 14.37% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RSINX and QCGDX have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QCGDX has higher volatility (6.32%) compared to RSINX (3.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSINX dropped -66.11% vs QCGDX's -22.37%.
RSINX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs 0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RSINX and QCGDX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer