RSNRX vs. DLDRX
Compare and contrast key facts about Victory Global Energy Transition Fund (RSNRX) and BNY Mellon Natural Resources Fund (DLDRX).
RSNRX is managed by Victory. It was launched on Nov 14, 1995. DLDRX is managed by Dreyfus. It was launched on Oct 30, 2003.
Performance
RSNRX vs. DLDRX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RSNRX vs. DLDRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RSNRX Victory Global Energy Transition Fund | 16.87% | 69.60% | 15.94% | -8.64% | 35.02% | 83.01% | 27.35% | -24.49% | -45.81% | 1.02% |
DLDRX BNY Mellon Natural Resources Fund | 24.66% | 15.04% | 0.81% | 1.58% | 34.18% | 38.30% | 6.58% | 16.64% | -17.57% | 14.05% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RSNRX achieves a 16.87% return, which is significantly lower than DLDRX's 24.66% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with RSNRX having a 13.96% annualized return and DLDRX not far ahead at 14.51%.
RSNRX
- 1D
- 1.28%
- 1M
- 0.26%
- YTD
- 16.87%
- 6M
- 31.78%
- 1Y
- 107.01%
- 3Y*
- 27.41%
- 5Y*
- 30.06%
- 10Y*
- 13.96%
DLDRX
- 1D
- 1.61%
- 1M
- -0.70%
- YTD
- 24.66%
- 6M
- 33.50%
- 1Y
- 49.03%
- 3Y*
- 14.64%
- 5Y*
- 18.06%
- 10Y*
- 14.51%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RSNRX vs. DLDRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
RSNRX has a 1.48% expense ratio, which is higher than DLDRX's 0.91% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RSNRX vs. DLDRX — Risk / Return Rank
RSNRX
DLDRX
RSNRX vs. DLDRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Victory Global Energy Transition Fund (RSNRX) and BNY Mellon Natural Resources Fund (DLDRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RSNRX | DLDRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 4.08 | 1.89 | +2.19 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.47 | 2.35 | +2.12 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.66 | 1.37 | +0.28 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.33 | 2.38 | +4.95 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 27.20 | 10.83 | +16.37 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RSNRX | DLDRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.08 | 1.89 | +2.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.19 | 0.70 | +0.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.44 | 0.57 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.29 | 0.40 | -0.11 |
Correlation
The correlation between RSNRX and DLDRX is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
RSNRX vs. DLDRX - Dividend Comparison
RSNRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.75%, more than DLDRX's 1.87% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RSNRX Victory Global Energy Transition Fund | 3.75% | 4.38% | 1.65% | 2.36% | 0.78% | 0.00% | 0.05% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
DLDRX BNY Mellon Natural Resources Fund | 1.87% | 2.33% | 7.45% | 12.42% | 9.66% | 5.07% | 1.11% | 2.16% | 1.87% | 0.63% | 1.44% | 1.25% |
Drawdowns
RSNRX vs. DLDRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RSNRX drawdown since its inception was -89.73%, which is greater than DLDRX's maximum drawdown of -69.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSNRX and DLDRX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RSNRX | DLDRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -89.73% | -69.13% | -20.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.36% | -20.88% | +6.52% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.44% | -32.44% | +7.00% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -84.27% | -54.24% | -30.03% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.65% | -0.70% | +0.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.07% | -20.92% | -5.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.87% | 4.59% | -0.72% |
Volatility
RSNRX vs. DLDRX - Volatility Comparison
Victory Global Energy Transition Fund (RSNRX) has a higher volatility of 6.66% compared to BNY Mellon Natural Resources Fund (DLDRX) at 6.23%. This indicates that RSNRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DLDRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RSNRX | DLDRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.66% | 6.23% | +0.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.24% | 15.24% | +4.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.79% | 26.59% | +0.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.47% | 25.95% | -0.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.80% | 25.57% | +6.23% |