PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DLDRX vs. DRLIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DLDRX vs. DRLIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BNY Mellon Natural Resources Fund (DLDRX) and BNY Mellon Global Real Estate Securities Fund (DRLIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DLDRX achieves a 18.01% return, which is significantly higher than DRLIX's 9.39% return. Over the past 10 years, DLDRX has outperformed DRLIX with an annualized return of 13.15%, while DRLIX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.18% annualized return.


DLDRX

1D
-1.48%
1M
-5.11%
YTD
18.01%
6M
18.08%
1Y
35.66%
3Y*
12.62%
5Y*
16.68%
10Y*
13.15%

DRLIX

1D
0.11%
1M
-0.96%
YTD
9.39%
6M
9.94%
1Y
12.65%
3Y*
9.77%
5Y*
2.82%
10Y*
5.18%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DLDRX vs. DRLIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DLDRX
BNY Mellon Natural Resources Fund
18.01%15.04%0.81%1.58%34.18%38.30%6.58%16.64%-17.57%14.05%
DRLIX
BNY Mellon Global Real Estate Securities Fund
9.39%9.12%3.21%11.35%-23.24%26.95%-2.30%23.05%-4.57%11.24%

Correlation

The correlation between DLDRX and DRLIX is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.39

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2007

0.54

Over the past year, the correlation between DLDRX and DRLIX has dropped to 0.33 - well below their long-term average of 0.54, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DLDRX vs. DRLIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DLDRX
DLDRX Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
DLDRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DLDRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
DLDRX Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
DLDRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
DLDRX Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

DRLIX
DRLIX Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
DRLIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DRLIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
DRLIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
DRLIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
DRLIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DLDRX vs. DRLIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Natural Resources Fund (DLDRX) and BNY Mellon Global Real Estate Securities Fund (DRLIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DLDRXDRLIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.81

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.19

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.61

1.23

+3.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.60

4.50

+9.10

DLDRX vs. DRLIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DLDRX Sharpe Ratio is 1.86, which is higher than the DRLIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DLDRX and DRLIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DLDRX vs. DRLIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DLDRX drawdown since its inception was -69.13%, roughly equal to the maximum DRLIX drawdown of -68.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DLDRX and DRLIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DLDRXDRLIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-69.13%

-68.86%

-0.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.64%

-10.13%

+2.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.44%

-17.55%

-14.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.44%

-31.86%

-0.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-54.24%

-41.82%

-12.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.64%

-2.41%

-5.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.73%

-14.32%

-6.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.59%

2.76%

-0.17%

Volatility

DLDRX vs. DRLIX - Volatility Comparison

BNY Mellon Natural Resources Fund (DLDRX) has a higher volatility of 6.54% compared to BNY Mellon Global Real Estate Securities Fund (DRLIX) at 4.03%. This indicates that DLDRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DRLIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DLDRXDRLIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.54%

4.03%

+2.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.37%

9.28%

+5.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.00%

11.91%

+7.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.68%

16.40%

+9.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.52%

17.64%

+7.88%

DLDRX vs. DRLIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DLDRX has a 0.91% expense ratio, which is lower than DRLIX's 1.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

DLDRX vs. DRLIX - Dividend Comparison

DLDRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.98%, less than DRLIX's 2.84% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DLDRX
BNY Mellon Natural Resources Fund
1.98%2.33%7.45%12.42%9.66%5.07%1.11%2.16%1.87%0.63%1.44%1.25%
DRLIX
BNY Mellon Global Real Estate Securities Fund
2.84%3.11%2.08%1.70%7.68%8.25%1.47%11.17%4.63%4.72%5.73%5.40%

Frequently Asked Questions


DLDRX and DRLIX have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DLDRX has higher volatility (6.54%) compared to DRLIX (4.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DLDRX dropped -69.13% vs DRLIX's -68.86%.

DLDRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.86 vs 1.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DLDRX and DRLIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer