RSMV vs. WEAT
RSMV (Relative Strength Managed Volatility Strategy ETF) and WEAT (Teucrium Wheat Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - RSMV is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Teucrium, while WEAT is a Agricultural Commodities fund tracking the Teucrium Wheat Fund Benchmark. RSMV is actively managed, while WEAT is passively managed. Over the past year, RSMV returned 25.51% vs -2.52% for WEAT. At a correlation of -0.06, they often move in opposite directions. RSMV charges 0.95%/yr vs 1.91%/yr for WEAT.
Performance
RSMV vs. WEAT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RSMV achieves a 9.21% return, which is significantly lower than WEAT's 12.52% return.
RSMV
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- 6.55%
- YTD
- 9.21%
- 6M
- 9.78%
- 1Y
- 25.51%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WEAT
- 1D
- -0.88%
- 1M
- -5.39%
- YTD
- 12.52%
- 6M
- 7.67%
- 1Y
- -2.52%
- 3Y*
- -10.84%
- 5Y*
- -8.11%
- 10Y*
- -7.13%
RSMV vs. WEAT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
RSMV Relative Strength Managed Volatility Strategy ETF | 9.21% | 11.08% |
WEAT Teucrium Wheat Fund | 12.52% | -17.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between RSMV and WEAT is -0.16, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 15, 2025 | -0.06 |
The correlation between RSMV and WEAT shifts across timeframes, from -0.16 (1 year) to -0.06 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RSMV vs. WEAT — Risk / Return Rank
RSMV
WEAT
RSMV vs. WEAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Relative Strength Managed Volatility Strategy ETF (RSMV) and Teucrium Wheat Fund (WEAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RSMV | WEAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.26 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.00 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.00 | +0.38 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.52 | -0.14 | +3.66 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.47 | -0.22 | +13.70 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RSMV | WEAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.15 | -0.11 | +2.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.27 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | -0.27 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.04 | -0.41 | +1.45 |
Drawdowns
RSMV vs. WEAT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RSMV drawdown since its inception was -17.58%, smaller than the maximum WEAT drawdown of -84.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSMV and WEAT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RSMV | WEAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.58% | -84.32% | +66.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.27% | -17.85% | +10.58% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -46.27% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -67.83% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -67.83% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.58% | -82.27% | +81.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.96% | -63.13% | +59.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.90% | 11.32% | -9.42% |
Volatility
RSMV vs. WEAT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Relative Strength Managed Volatility Strategy ETF (RSMV) is 4.39%, while Teucrium Wheat Fund (WEAT) has a volatility of 9.88%. This indicates that RSMV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WEAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RSMV | WEAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.39% | 9.88% | -5.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.67% | 18.06% | -8.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.94% | 22.64% | -10.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.52% | 30.50% | -15.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.52% | 26.80% | -12.28% |
RSMV vs. WEAT - Expense Ratio Comparison
RSMV has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than WEAT's 1.91% expense ratio.
Dividends
RSMV vs. WEAT - Dividend Comparison
RSMV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.92%, while WEAT has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
RSMV Relative Strength Managed Volatility Strategy ETF | 0.92% | 1.00% |
WEAT Teucrium Wheat Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RSMV and WEAT have a correlation of -0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WEAT has higher volatility (9.88%) compared to RSMV (4.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSMV dropped -17.58% vs WEAT's -84.32%.
On 1-year performance, RSMV leads with 25.51% vs -2.52% for WEAT. On fees, RSMV is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, RSMV has been the lower-risk option at 4.39%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, RSMV has performed better with a 25.51% return vs -2.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RSMV is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.91% for WEAT.
RSMV has the higher dividend yield at 0.92%, compared with 0.00% for WEAT.
RSMV is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while WEAT is Agricultural Commodities. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for RSMV and 1.91% for WEAT.
RSMV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs -0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RSMV and WEAT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer