RSMC vs. ESML
RSMC (Rockefeller U.S. Small-Mid Cap ETF) and ESML (iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA Small-Cap ETF) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds. RSMC is actively managed, while ESML is passively managed. Over the past year, RSMC returned 18.15% vs 41.48% for ESML. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. RSMC charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.17%/yr for ESML.
Performance
RSMC vs. ESML - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RSMC achieves a 6.73% return, which is significantly lower than ESML's 9.51% return.
RSMC
- 1D
- 1.09%
- 1M
- 9.37%
- YTD
- 6.73%
- 6M
- 3.09%
- 1Y
- 18.15%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ESML
- 1D
- 0.58%
- 1M
- 7.93%
- YTD
- 9.51%
- 6M
- 11.24%
- 1Y
- 41.48%
- 3Y*
- 15.73%
- 5Y*
- 6.16%
- 10Y*
- —
RSMC vs. ESML - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
RSMC Rockefeller U.S. Small-Mid Cap ETF | 6.73% | -1.02% | 0.68% |
ESML iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA Small-Cap ETF | 9.51% | 10.62% | 0.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between RSMC and ESML is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification — they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2024 | 0.91 |
The correlation between RSMC and ESML has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.91 — a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RSMC vs. ESML — Risk / Return Rank
RSMC
ESML
RSMC vs. ESML - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rockefeller U.S. Small-Mid Cap ETF (RSMC) and iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA Small-Cap ETF (ESML). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RSMC | ESML | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.03 | 2.38 | -1.35 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.55 | 3.36 | -1.80 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.41 | -0.22 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.99 | 4.98 | -2.99 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.00 | 18.32 | -12.33 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RSMC | ESML | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.03 | 2.38 | -1.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.29 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.20 | 0.43 | -0.23 |
Drawdowns
RSMC vs. ESML - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RSMC drawdown since its inception was -22.33%, smaller than the maximum ESML drawdown of -41.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSMC and ESML.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RSMC | ESML | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.33% | -41.97% | +19.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.49% | -9.04% | -1.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -28.61% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.85% | 0.00% | -0.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.61% | -9.11% | +3.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.48% | 2.46% | +1.02% |
Volatility
RSMC vs. ESML - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Rockefeller U.S. Small-Mid Cap ETF (RSMC) is 5.90%, while iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA Small-Cap ETF (ESML) has a volatility of 6.27%. This indicates that RSMC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ESML based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RSMC | ESML | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.90% | 6.27% | -0.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.22% | 12.70% | +0.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.75% | 17.63% | +0.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.81% | 21.31% | -0.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.81% | 23.53% | -2.72% |
RSMC vs. ESML - Expense Ratio Comparison
RSMC has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than ESML's 0.17% expense ratio.
Dividends
RSMC vs. ESML - Dividend Comparison
RSMC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ESML's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RSMC Rockefeller U.S. Small-Mid Cap ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ESML iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA Small-Cap ETF | 1.01% | 1.08% | 1.22% | 1.31% | 1.46% | 0.94% | 0.99% | 1.10% | 1.07% |