RSMC vs. SMMV
RSMC (Rockefeller U.S. Small-Mid Cap ETF) and SMMV (iShares MSCI USA Small-Cap Min Vol Factor ETF) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds. RSMC is actively managed, while SMMV is passively managed. Over the past year, RSMC returned 18.15% vs 12.59% for SMMV. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RSMC charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for SMMV.
Performance
RSMC vs. SMMV - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RSMC achieves a 6.73% return, which is significantly higher than SMMV's 3.79% return.
RSMC
- 1D
- 1.09%
- 1M
- 9.37%
- YTD
- 6.73%
- 6M
- 3.09%
- 1Y
- 18.15%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SMMV
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- 1.51%
- YTD
- 3.79%
- 6M
- 5.69%
- 1Y
- 12.59%
- 3Y*
- 10.70%
- 5Y*
- 5.20%
- 10Y*
- —
RSMC vs. SMMV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
RSMC Rockefeller U.S. Small-Mid Cap ETF | 6.73% | -1.02% | 0.68% |
SMMV iShares MSCI USA Small-Cap Min Vol Factor ETF | 3.79% | 6.42% | 1.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between RSMC and SMMV is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2024 | 0.79 |
The correlation between RSMC and SMMV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.79 — a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RSMC vs. SMMV — Risk / Return Rank
RSMC
SMMV
RSMC vs. SMMV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rockefeller U.S. Small-Mid Cap ETF (RSMC) and iShares MSCI USA Small-Cap Min Vol Factor ETF (SMMV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RSMC | SMMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.03 | 1.22 | -0.19 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.55 | 1.79 | -0.24 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.22 | -0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.99 | 2.26 | -0.27 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.00 | 8.24 | -2.24 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RSMC | SMMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.03 | 1.22 | -0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.39 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.20 | 0.54 | -0.33 |
Drawdowns
RSMC vs. SMMV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RSMC drawdown since its inception was -22.33%, smaller than the maximum SMMV drawdown of -38.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSMC and SMMV.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RSMC | SMMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.33% | -38.77% | +16.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.49% | -7.02% | -3.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -18.00% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.85% | -2.80% | +1.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.61% | -5.13% | -0.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.48% | 1.93% | +1.55% |
Volatility
RSMC vs. SMMV - Volatility Comparison
Rockefeller U.S. Small-Mid Cap ETF (RSMC) has a higher volatility of 5.90% compared to iShares MSCI USA Small-Cap Min Vol Factor ETF (SMMV) at 3.67%. This indicates that RSMC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SMMV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RSMC | SMMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.90% | 3.67% | +2.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.22% | 6.79% | +6.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.75% | 10.50% | +7.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.81% | 13.55% | +7.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.81% | 15.78% | +5.03% |
RSMC vs. SMMV - Expense Ratio Comparison
RSMC has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than SMMV's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
RSMC vs. SMMV - Dividend Comparison
RSMC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SMMV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.72%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RSMC Rockefeller U.S. Small-Mid Cap ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SMMV iShares MSCI USA Small-Cap Min Vol Factor ETF | 1.72% | 1.77% | 1.76% | 2.30% | 1.67% | 1.08% | 1.39% | 1.64% | 1.72% | 1.63% | 0.79% |