ACEL vs. NATR
ACEL (Accel Entertainment, Inc.) and NATR (Nature's Sunshine Products, Inc.) are both stocks. ACEL operates in Gambling (Consumer Cyclical), while NATR operates in Packaged Foods (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 5 years, ACEL returned -1.84%/yr vs -0.48%/yr for NATR. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ACEL vs. NATR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ACEL achieves a 2.89% return, which is significantly higher than NATR's -7.78% return.
ACEL
- 1D
- -2.17%
- 1M
- -3.85%
- YTD
- 2.89%
- 6M
- 10.86%
- 1Y
- 4.08%
- 3Y*
- 6.72%
- 5Y*
- -1.84%
- 10Y*
- —
NATR
- 1D
- -4.51%
- 1M
- -23.55%
- YTD
- -7.78%
- 6M
- -5.69%
- 1Y
- 35.65%
- 3Y*
- 18.40%
- 5Y*
- -0.48%
- 10Y*
- 7.73%
ACEL vs. NATR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACEL Accel Entertainment, Inc. | 2.89% | 6.84% | 3.99% | 33.38% | -40.86% | 28.91% | -19.20% | 14.16% |
NATR Nature's Sunshine Products, Inc. | -7.78% | 47.20% | -15.21% | 107.81% | -55.03% | 30.66% | 67.41% | -7.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between ACEL and NATR is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 22, 2019 | 0.26 |
Fundamentals
ACEL:
$987.26M
NATR:
$356.79M
ACEL:
$0.60
NATR:
$1.09
ACEL:
19.57
NATR:
18.22
ACEL:
0.60
NATR:
0.71
ACEL:
0.74
NATR:
0.74
ACEL:
3.63
NATR:
2.14
ACEL:
$1.36B
NATR:
$489.79M
ACEL:
$432.42M
NATR:
$342.26M
ACEL:
$178.48M
NATR:
$37.50M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ACEL vs. NATR — Risk / Return Rank
ACEL
NATR
ACEL vs. NATR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Accel Entertainment, Inc. (ACEL) and Nature's Sunshine Products, Inc. (NATR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ACEL | NATR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.11 | 0.75 | -0.63 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.42 | 1.70 | -1.29 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.20 | -0.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.16 | 1.26 | -1.10 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.30 | 3.71 | -3.41 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ACEL | NATR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.11 | 0.75 | -0.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.05 | -0.01 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.16 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.02 | 0.26 | -0.24 |
Drawdowns
ACEL vs. NATR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ACEL drawdown since its inception was -57.83%, smaller than the maximum NATR drawdown of -62.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACEL and NATR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ACEL | NATR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.83% | -62.16% | +4.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.02% | -28.42% | +2.40% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.02% | -45.66% | +19.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.08% | -60.84% | +13.76% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -62.00% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.31% | -28.42% | +9.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.24% | -27.09% | +2.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.66% | 9.63% | +4.03% |
Volatility
ACEL vs. NATR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Accel Entertainment, Inc. (ACEL) is 11.27%, while Nature's Sunshine Products, Inc. (NATR) has a volatility of 12.01%. This indicates that ACEL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NATR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ACEL | NATR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.27% | 12.01% | -0.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.50% | 25.00% | +1.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.08% | 48.08% | -12.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.45% | 42.93% | -7.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 43.95% | 48.87% | -4.92% |
Dividends
ACEL vs. NATR - Dividend Comparison
Neither ACEL nor NATR has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACEL Accel Entertainment, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NATR Nature's Sunshine Products, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 5.41% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.87% | 2.67% | 3.95% |
Financials
ACEL vs. NATR - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Accel Entertainment, Inc. and Nature's Sunshine Products, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ACEL vs. NATR - Profitability Comparison
ACEL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Accel Entertainment, Inc. reported a gross profit of 109.94M and revenue of 351.56M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 31.3%.
NATR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Nature's Sunshine Products, Inc. reported a gross profit of 89.98M and revenue of 122.89M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 73.2%.
ACEL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Accel Entertainment, Inc. reported an operating income of 27.08M and revenue of 351.56M, resulting in an operating margin of 7.7%.
NATR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Nature's Sunshine Products, Inc. reported an operating income of 9.55M and revenue of 122.89M, resulting in an operating margin of 7.8%.
ACEL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Accel Entertainment, Inc. reported a net income of 14.67M and revenue of 351.56M, resulting in a net margin of 4.2%.
NATR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Nature's Sunshine Products, Inc. reported a net income of 5.12M and revenue of 122.89M, resulting in a net margin of 4.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
ACEL and NATR have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NATR has higher volatility (12.01%) compared to ACEL (11.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ACEL dropped -57.83% vs NATR's -62.16%.
NATR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.75 vs 0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ACEL and NATR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer