ACEL vs. MCS
ACEL (Accel Entertainment, Inc.) and MCS (The Marcus Corporation) are both stocks. ACEL operates in Gambling (Consumer Cyclical), while MCS operates in Entertainment (Communication Services). Over the past 5 years, ACEL returned -1.84%/yr vs -1.16%/yr for MCS. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ACEL vs. MCS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ACEL achieves a 2.89% return, which is significantly lower than MCS's 26.91% return.
ACEL
- 1D
- -2.17%
- 1M
- -3.85%
- YTD
- 2.89%
- 6M
- 10.86%
- 1Y
- 4.08%
- 3Y*
- 6.72%
- 5Y*
- -1.84%
- 10Y*
- —
MCS
- 1D
- -2.26%
- 1M
- 14.19%
- YTD
- 26.91%
- 6M
- 27.48%
- 1Y
- 12.88%
- 3Y*
- 9.80%
- 5Y*
- -1.16%
- 10Y*
- 1.37%
ACEL vs. MCS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACEL Accel Entertainment, Inc. | 2.89% | 6.84% | 3.99% | 33.38% | -40.86% | 28.91% | -19.20% | 14.16% |
MCS The Marcus Corporation | 26.91% | -26.56% | 50.38% | 2.94% | -18.93% | 32.49% | -57.29% | -4.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between ACEL and MCS is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 22, 2019 | 0.37 |
The correlation between ACEL and MCS shifts across timeframes, from 0.34 (3 years) to 0.47 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
ACEL:
$987.26M
MCS:
$598.28M
ACEL:
$0.60
MCS:
$0.46
ACEL:
19.57
MCS:
42.74
ACEL:
0.74
MCS:
0.79
ACEL:
3.63
MCS:
0.60
ACEL:
$1.36B
MCS:
$764.10M
ACEL:
$432.42M
MCS:
$868.52M
ACEL:
$178.48M
MCS:
$92.46M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ACEL vs. MCS — Risk / Return Rank
ACEL
MCS
ACEL vs. MCS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Accel Entertainment, Inc. (ACEL) and The Marcus Corporation (MCS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ACEL | MCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.11 | 0.38 | -0.27 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.42 | 0.79 | -0.37 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.09 | -0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.16 | 0.47 | -0.31 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.30 | 1.02 | -0.72 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ACEL | MCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.11 | 0.38 | -0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.05 | -0.04 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.03 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.02 | 0.17 | -0.14 |
Drawdowns
ACEL vs. MCS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ACEL drawdown since its inception was -57.83%, smaller than the maximum MCS drawdown of -83.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACEL and MCS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ACEL | MCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.83% | -83.85% | +26.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.02% | -27.44% | +1.42% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.02% | -42.87% | +16.85% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.08% | -54.40% | +7.32% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -83.85% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.31% | -52.20% | +32.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.24% | -28.37% | +4.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.66% | 12.69% | +0.97% |
Volatility
ACEL vs. MCS - Volatility Comparison
Accel Entertainment, Inc. (ACEL) and The Marcus Corporation (MCS) have volatilities of 11.27% and 10.74%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ACEL | MCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.27% | 10.74% | +0.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.50% | 22.48% | +4.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.08% | 34.12% | +1.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.45% | 31.82% | +3.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 43.95% | 44.65% | -0.70% |
Dividends
ACEL vs. MCS - Dividend Comparison
ACEL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MCS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.64%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACEL Accel Entertainment, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MCS The Marcus Corporation | 1.64% | 1.93% | 1.30% | 1.65% | 0.69% | 0.00% | 1.26% | 2.01% | 1.52% | 1.83% | 1.43% | 2.16% |
Financials
ACEL vs. MCS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Accel Entertainment, Inc. and The Marcus Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ACEL vs. MCS - Profitability Comparison
ACEL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Accel Entertainment, Inc. reported a gross profit of 109.94M and revenue of 351.56M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 31.3%.
MCS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Marcus Corporation reported a gross profit of 137.82M and revenue of 154.40M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 89.3%.
ACEL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Accel Entertainment, Inc. reported an operating income of 27.08M and revenue of 351.56M, resulting in an operating margin of 7.7%.
MCS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Marcus Corporation reported an operating income of -19.26M and revenue of 154.40M, resulting in an operating margin of -12.5%.
ACEL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Accel Entertainment, Inc. reported a net income of 14.67M and revenue of 351.56M, resulting in a net margin of 4.2%.
MCS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Marcus Corporation reported a net income of -15.35M and revenue of 154.40M, resulting in a net margin of -9.9%.
Frequently Asked Questions
ACEL and MCS have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ACEL has higher volatility (11.27%) compared to MCS (10.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ACEL dropped -57.83% vs MCS's -83.85%.
MCS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.38 vs 0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ACEL and MCS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer