RSG vs. GRMN
RSG (Republic Services, Inc.) and GRMN (Garmin Ltd.) are both stocks. RSG operates in Waste Management (Industrials), while GRMN operates in Scientific & Technical Instruments (Technology). Over the past 10 years, RSG returned 17.46%/yr vs 22.02%/yr for GRMN. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
RSG vs. GRMN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RSG achieves a -0.38% return, which is significantly lower than GRMN's 17.83% return. Over the past 10 years, RSG has underperformed GRMN with an annualized return of 17.46%, while GRMN has yielded a comparatively higher 22.02% annualized return.
RSG
- 1D
- 0.89%
- 1M
- 0.76%
- YTD
- -0.38%
- 6M
- -1.18%
- 1Y
- -15.54%
- 3Y*
- 14.95%
- 5Y*
- 15.35%
- 10Y*
- 17.46%
GRMN
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- 5.47%
- YTD
- 17.83%
- 6M
- 14.71%
- 1Y
- 20.22%
- 3Y*
- 32.81%
- 5Y*
- 12.86%
- 10Y*
- 22.02%
RSG vs. GRMN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RSG Republic Services, Inc. | -0.38% | 6.44% | 23.03% | 29.64% | -6.16% | 47.03% | 9.53% | 26.62% | 8.85% | 20.96% |
GRMN Garmin Ltd. | 17.83% | -0.06% | 63.25% | 43.12% | -30.20% | 15.90% | 25.86% | 58.13% | 9.84% | 27.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between RSG and GRMN is -0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.00 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2000 | 0.30 |
The correlation between RSG and GRMN shifts across timeframes, from -0.00 (1 year) to 0.34 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
RSG:
$64.88B
GRMN:
$46.09B
RSG:
$6.98
GRMN:
$8.97
RSG:
30.07
GRMN:
26.55
RSG:
2.12
GRMN:
2.13
RSG:
3.91
GRMN:
6.18
RSG:
5.42
GRMN:
4.97
RSG:
$16.70B
GRMN:
$7.46B
RSG:
$3.80B
GRMN:
$4.41B
RSG:
$4.89B
GRMN:
$2.26B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RSG vs. GRMN — Risk / Return Rank
RSG
GRMN
RSG vs. GRMN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Republic Services, Inc. (RSG) and Garmin Ltd. (GRMN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RSG | GRMN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.38 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.00 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.87 | 1.12 | -0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.77 | 0.58 | -1.35 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.28 | 1.27 | -2.55 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RSG vs. GRMN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RSG drawdown since its inception was -65.99%, smaller than the maximum GRMN drawdown of -87.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSG and GRMN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RSG | GRMN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.99% | -87.71% | +21.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.44% | -27.97% | +7.53% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.54% | -27.97% | +5.43% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.54% | -54.63% | +32.09% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.02% | -54.63% | +20.61% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.77% | -11.00% | -6.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.83% | -31.54% | +19.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.50% | 12.79% | -0.29% |
Volatility
RSG vs. GRMN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Republic Services, Inc. (RSG) is 7.23%, while Garmin Ltd. (GRMN) has a volatility of 8.24%. This indicates that RSG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GRMN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RSG | GRMN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.23% | 8.24% | -1.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.74% | 22.18% | -8.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.67% | 30.32% | -11.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.17% | 30.41% | -12.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.08% | 28.36% | -9.28% |
Dividends
RSG vs. GRMN - Dividend Comparison
RSG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.17%, less than GRMN's 1.51% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GRMN Garmin Ltd. | 1.51% | 1.70% | 1.44% | 2.27% | 3.10% | 1.92% | 2.01% | 2.30% | 3.32% | 3.42% | 4.21% | 5.41% |
RSG Republic Services, Inc. | 1.17% | 1.12% | 0.82% | 1.25% | 1.48% | 1.27% | 1.72% | 1.74% | 2.00% | 1.97% | 2.17% | 2.64% |
Financials
RSG vs. GRMN - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Republic Services, Inc. and Garmin Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
RSG vs. GRMN - Profitability Comparison
RSG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Republic Services, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 4.11B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
GRMN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Garmin Ltd. reported a gross profit of 1.04B and revenue of 1.75B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 59.4%.
RSG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Republic Services, Inc. reported an operating income of 830.00M and revenue of 4.11B, resulting in an operating margin of 20.2%.
GRMN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Garmin Ltd. reported an operating income of 431.67M and revenue of 1.75B, resulting in an operating margin of 24.6%.
RSG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Republic Services, Inc. reported a net income of 525.00M and revenue of 4.11B, resulting in a net margin of 12.8%.
GRMN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Garmin Ltd. reported a net income of 405.08M and revenue of 1.75B, resulting in a net margin of 23.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
RSG and GRMN have a correlation of -0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GRMN has higher volatility (8.24%) compared to RSG (7.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSG dropped -65.99% vs GRMN's -87.71%.
GRMN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.53 vs -0.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RSG and GRMN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer