RSG vs. CB
RSG (Republic Services, Inc.) and CB (Chubb Limited) are both stocks. RSG operates in Waste Management (Industrials), while CB operates in Insurance - Property & Casualty (Financial Services). Over the past 10 years, RSG returned 17.42%/yr vs 12.26%/yr for CB. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
RSG vs. CB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RSG achieves a -1.24% return, which is significantly lower than CB's 5.39% return. Over the past 10 years, RSG has outperformed CB with an annualized return of 17.42%, while CB has yielded a comparatively lower 12.26% annualized return.
RSG
- 1D
- -0.87%
- 1M
- -0.11%
- YTD
- -1.24%
- 6M
- -2.80%
- 1Y
- -16.27%
- 3Y*
- 13.92%
- 5Y*
- 15.23%
- 10Y*
- 17.42%
CB
- 1D
- -0.36%
- 1M
- 1.18%
- YTD
- 5.39%
- 6M
- 5.22%
- 1Y
- 15.46%
- 3Y*
- 20.42%
- 5Y*
- 16.13%
- 10Y*
- 12.26%
RSG vs. CB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RSG Republic Services, Inc. | -1.24% | 6.44% | 23.03% | 29.64% | -6.16% | 47.03% | 9.53% | 26.62% | 8.85% | 20.96% |
CB Chubb Limited | 5.39% | 14.46% | 23.89% | 4.20% | 15.97% | 27.85% | 1.41% | 22.94% | -9.63% | 12.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between RSG and CB is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 1998 | 0.37 |
Fundamentals
RSG:
$64.32B
CB:
$129.01B
RSG:
$6.98
CB:
$28.35
RSG:
29.81
CB:
11.53
RSG:
2.10
CB:
0.80
RSG:
3.87
CB:
2.71
RSG:
5.37
CB:
1.61
RSG:
$16.70B
CB:
$48.15B
RSG:
$3.80B
CB:
$17.01B
RSG:
$4.89B
CB:
$12.22B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RSG vs. CB — Risk / Return Rank
RSG
CB
RSG vs. CB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Republic Services, Inc. (RSG) and Chubb Limited (CB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RSG | CB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.76 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.53 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.87 | 1.17 | -0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.81 | 1.66 | -2.46 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.34 | 3.77 | -5.10 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RSG vs. CB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RSG drawdown since its inception was -65.99%, which is greater than CB's maximum drawdown of -50.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSG and CB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RSG | CB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.99% | -50.99% | -15.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.28% | -9.36% | -10.92% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.54% | -14.35% | -8.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.54% | -19.26% | -3.28% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.02% | -42.59% | +8.57% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.48% | -4.03% | -14.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.83% | -10.68% | -1.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.36% | 4.11% | +8.25% |
Volatility
RSG vs. CB - Volatility Comparison
Republic Services, Inc. (RSG) has a higher volatility of 6.88% compared to Chubb Limited (CB) at 5.99%. This indicates that RSG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RSG | CB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.88% | 5.99% | +0.89% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.66% | 12.76% | +0.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.66% | 17.66% | +1.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.18% | 20.33% | -2.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.09% | 23.69% | -4.60% |
Dividends
RSG vs. CB - Dividend Comparison
RSG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.18%, less than CB's 1.20% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CB Chubb Limited | 1.20% | 1.22% | 1.30% | 1.51% | 1.49% | 1.65% | 2.01% | 1.91% | 2.24% | 1.93% | 2.07% | 4.23% |
RSG Republic Services, Inc. | 1.18% | 1.12% | 0.82% | 1.25% | 1.48% | 1.27% | 1.72% | 1.74% | 2.00% | 1.97% | 2.17% | 2.64% |
Financials
RSG vs. CB - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Republic Services, Inc. and Chubb Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
RSG and CB have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RSG has higher volatility (6.88%) compared to CB (5.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSG dropped -65.99% vs CB's -50.99%.
CB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.88 vs -0.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RSG and CB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer