RSEGX vs. USAGX

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

RSEGX (Victory RS Small Cap Growth Fund) and USAGX (USAA Precious Metals and Minerals Fund) are both mutual funds - RSEGX is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Victory, while USAGX is a Precious Metals fund managed by Victory. Over the past 10 years, RSEGX returned 8.62%/yr vs 13.09%/yr for USAGX. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RSEGX charges 1.40%/yr vs 1.12%/yr for USAGX.

Performance

RSEGX vs. USAGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Victory RS Small Cap Growth Fund (RSEGX) and USAA Precious Metals and Minerals Fund (USAGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSEGX achieves a 18.26% return, which is significantly higher than USAGX's -0.58% return. Over the past 10 years, RSEGX has underperformed USAGX with an annualized return of 8.62%, while USAGX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.09% annualized return.

RSEGX

• 1D: -0.33%
• 1M: 6.78%
• YTD: 18.26%
• 6M: 17.92%
• 1Y: 35.61%
• 3Y*: 13.71%
• 5Y*: -1.57%
• 10Y*: 8.62%

USAGX

• 1D: -3.28%
• 1M: -1.24%
• YTD: -0.58%
• 6M: 5.19%
• 1Y: 57.84%
• 3Y*: 40.08%
• 5Y*: 17.07%
• 10Y*: 13.09%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RSEGX vs. USAGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RSEGX Victory RS Small Cap Growth Fund	18.26%	0.88%	11.08%	19.80%	-37.08%	-11.57%	37.83%	37.94%	-9.31%	36.88%
USAGX USAA Precious Metals and Minerals Fund	-0.58%	156.06%	10.76%	6.73%	-11.80%	-10.14%	25.85%	42.97%	-12.26%	9.65%

Correlation

The correlation between RSEGX and USAGX is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.30
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.28
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.28
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.20
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 1990	0.17

The correlation between RSEGX and USAGX shifts across timeframes, from 0.17 (all time) to 0.30 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

RSEGX vs. USAGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RSEGX

RSEGX Risk / Return Rank: 36
RSEGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
RSEGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
RSEGX Omega Ratio Rank: 29
RSEGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
RSEGX Martin Ratio Rank: 42

USAGX

USAGX Risk / Return Rank: 26
USAGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
USAGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 20
USAGX Omega Ratio Rank: 27
USAGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
USAGX Martin Ratio Rank: 22

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RSEGX vs. USAGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Victory RS Small Cap Growth Fund (RSEGX) and USAA Precious Metals and Minerals Fund (USAGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RSEGX	USAGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.73	1.56	+0.17
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.41	1.96	+0.46
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.28	+0.01
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.41	2.23	+0.18
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	9.09	5.83	+3.25
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RSEGX vs. USAGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RSEGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.73, which is comparable to the USAGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSEGX and USAGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RSEGX	USAGX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.73	1.56	+0.17
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.06	0.52	-0.58
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.33	0.40	-0.07
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.38	0.19	+0.19

Drawdowns

RSEGX vs. USAGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSEGX drawdown since its inception was -82.12%, roughly equal to the maximum USAGX drawdown of -80.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSEGX and USAGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	RSEGX	USAGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-82.12%	-80.89%	-1.23%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.15%	-30.12%	+14.97%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-33.72%	-30.12%	-3.60%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-48.82%	-45.72%	-3.10%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-52.89%	-51.03%	-1.86%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-20.84%	-25.60%	+4.76%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-32.86%	-43.08%	+10.22%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.02%	11.50%	-7.48%

Volatility

RSEGX vs. USAGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Victory RS Small Cap Growth Fund (RSEGX) is 6.25%, while USAA Precious Metals and Minerals Fund (USAGX) has a volatility of 14.19%. This indicates that RSEGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USAGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RSEGX	USAGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.25%	14.19%	-7.94%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.29%	35.25%	-18.96%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.10%	43.02%	-21.92%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	27.46%	32.86%	-5.40%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.09%	32.81%	-6.72%

RSEGX vs. USAGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RSEGX has a 1.40% expense ratio, which is higher than USAGX's 1.12% expense ratio.

Dividends

RSEGX vs. USAGX - Dividend Comparison

RSEGX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while USAGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.24%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
RSEGX Victory RS Small Cap Growth Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	6.25%	16.78%	9.05%	9.01%	20.43%	9.55%	0.00%	1.33%
USAGX USAA Precious Metals and Minerals Fund	0.24%	0.24%	0.00%	2.45%	0.95%	0.84%	0.04%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	4.20%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RSEGX and USAGX in my portfolio?

RSEGX and USAGX have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RSEGX or USAGX?

USAGX has higher volatility (14.19%) compared to RSEGX (6.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSEGX dropped -82.12% vs USAGX's -80.89%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RSEGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.73 vs 1.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.