RSEE vs. QAI

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

RSEE (Rareview Systematic Equity ETF) and QAI (IQ Hedge Multi-Strategy Tracker ETF) are both Long-Short funds. RSEE is actively managed, while QAI is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, RSEE returned 17.96%/yr vs 9.95%/yr for QAI. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RSEE charges 1.27%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for QAI.

Performance

RSEE vs. QAI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Rareview Systematic Equity ETF (RSEE) and IQ Hedge Multi-Strategy Tracker ETF (QAI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSEE achieves a 12.65% return, which is significantly higher than QAI's 8.45% return.

RSEE

• 1D: -2.89%
• 1M: -0.47%
• YTD: 12.65%
• 6M: 11.67%
• 1Y: 32.53%
• 3Y*: 17.96%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QAI

• 1D: -1.20%
• 1M: 0.61%
• YTD: 8.45%
• 6M: 8.10%
• 1Y: 15.12%
• 3Y*: 9.95%
• 5Y*: 4.45%
• 10Y*: 3.94%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RSEE vs. QAI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
RSEE Rareview Systematic Equity ETF	12.65%	20.54%	18.54%	10.21%	-2.49%
QAI IQ Hedge Multi-Strategy Tracker ETF	8.45%	8.29%	6.67%	10.07%	-7.13%

Correlation

The correlation between RSEE and QAI is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.92
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.84
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 21, 2022	0.77

The correlation between RSEE and QAI shifts across timeframes, from 0.77 (all time) to 0.92 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

RSEE vs. QAI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RSEE

RSEE Risk / Return Rank: 56
RSEE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
RSEE Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
RSEE Omega Ratio Rank: 53
RSEE Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
RSEE Martin Ratio Rank: 62

QAI

QAI Risk / Return Rank: 80
QAI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
QAI Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
QAI Omega Ratio Rank: 81
QAI Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
QAI Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RSEE vs. QAI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rareview Systematic Equity ETF (RSEE) and IQ Hedge Multi-Strategy Tracker ETF (QAI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RSEE	QAI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.74	2.31	-0.57
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.36	3.20	-0.85
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.46	-0.15
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.54	4.09	-1.55
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.23	16.12	-5.89

RSEE vs. QAI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RSEE Sharpe Ratio is 1.74, which is comparable to the QAI Sharpe Ratio of 2.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSEE and QAI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RSEE vs. QAI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSEE drawdown since its inception was -21.60%, which is greater than QAI's maximum drawdown of -14.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSEE and QAI.

Drawdown Indicators

	RSEE	QAI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.60%	-14.95%	-6.65%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.89%	-3.71%	-9.18%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.60%	-7.78%	-13.82%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-14.32%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-14.95%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.77%	-1.20%	-2.57%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.77%	-2.57%	-1.20%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.19%	0.94%	+2.25%

Volatility

RSEE vs. QAI - Volatility Comparison

Rareview Systematic Equity ETF (RSEE) has a higher volatility of 8.04% compared to IQ Hedge Multi-Strategy Tracker ETF (QAI) at 3.12%. This indicates that RSEE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QAI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RSEE	QAI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.04%	3.12%	+4.92%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.53%	5.63%	+9.90%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.84%	6.58%	+12.26%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.22%	6.67%	+12.55%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.22%	6.23%	+12.99%

RSEE vs. QAI - Expense Ratio Comparison

RSEE has a 1.27% expense ratio, which is higher than QAI's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

RSEE vs. QAI - Dividend Comparison

RSEE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QAI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.39%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
QAI IQ Hedge Multi-Strategy Tracker ETF	1.39%	1.50%	2.22%	4.08%	2.00%	0.28%	1.98%	1.91%	1.90%	0.00%	0.00%	0.48%
RSEE Rareview Systematic Equity ETF	0.00%	0.24%	9.02%	0.84%	1.97%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RSEE and QAI in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.92, RSEE and QAI move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, RSEE or QAI?

RSEE has higher volatility (8.04%) compared to QAI (3.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSEE dropped -21.60% vs QAI's -14.95%.

Which ETF is better, RSEE or QAI?

On 3-year performance, RSEE leads with 17.96% vs 9.95% for QAI. On fees, QAI is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, QAI has been the lower-risk option at 3.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RSEE or QAI?

Over the 3-year period, RSEE has performed better with a 17.96% return vs 9.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RSEE or QAI?

QAI is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 1.27% for RSEE.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RSEE or QAI?

QAI has the higher dividend yield at 1.39%, compared with 0.00% for RSEE.

What is the main difference between RSEE and QAI?

They also come from different issuers: Rareview Funds and New York Life. Their fees differ too: 1.27% for RSEE and 0.79% for QAI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QAI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs 1.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.