RSEE vs. HYDB

In the year-to-date period, RSEE achieves a -6.70% return, which is significantly lower than HYDB's 0.94% return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

RSEE has a 1.27% expense ratio, which is higher than HYDB's 0.35% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rareview Systematic Equity ETF (RSEE) and iShares High Yield Bond Factor ETF (HYDB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current RSEE Sharpe Ratio is 0.25, which is lower than the HYDB Sharpe Ratio of 1.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSEE and HYDB, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

RSEE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.67%, more than HYDB's 7.00% yield.

The maximum RSEE drawdown since its inception was -21.60%, roughly equal to the maximum HYDB drawdown of -21.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSEE and HYDB. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Rareview Systematic Equity ETF (RSEE) has a higher volatility of 16.74% compared to iShares High Yield Bond Factor ETF (HYDB) at 4.60%. This indicates that RSEE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HYDB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.