RSBT vs. ILS

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Return Stacked Bonds & Managed Futures ETF (RSBT) and Brookmont Catastrophic Bond ETF (ILS).

RSBT and ILS are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. RSBT is an actively managed fund by Return Stacked. It was launched on Feb 7, 2023. ILS is an actively managed fund by Brookmont. It was launched on Mar 31, 2025.

Performance

RSBT vs. ILS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Return Stacked Bonds & Managed Futures ETF (RSBT) and Brookmont Catastrophic Bond ETF (ILS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

RSBT vs. ILS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
RSBT Return Stacked Bonds & Managed Futures ETF	5.19%	9.85%
ILS Brookmont Catastrophic Bond ETF	1.04%	5.60%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSBT achieves a 5.19% return, which is significantly higher than ILS's 1.04% return.

RSBT

• 1D: 0.37%
• 1M: -4.56%
• YTD: 5.19%
• 6M: 11.52%
• 1Y: 14.67%
• 3Y*: 2.90%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ILS

• 1D: 0.10%
• 1M: 0.27%
• YTD: 1.04%
• 6M: 2.11%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RSBT vs. ILS - Expense Ratio Comparison

RSBT has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is lower than ILS's 1.58% expense ratio.

ILS

Brookmont Catastrophic Bond ETF

RSBT

Return Stacked Bonds & Managed Futures ETF

Return for Risk

RSBT vs. ILS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RSBT

RSBT Risk / Return Rank: 54
RSBT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
RSBT Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
RSBT Omega Ratio Rank: 49
RSBT Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
RSBT Martin Ratio Rank: 42

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RSBT vs. ILS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Return Stacked Bonds & Managed Futures ETF (RSBT) and Brookmont Catastrophic Bond ETF (ILS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RSBT	ILS	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.99	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.35	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.72	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	3.77	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RSBT	ILS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.99	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.02	1.92	-1.94

Correlation

The correlation between RSBT and ILS is -0.07. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.

Dividends

RSBT vs. ILS - Dividend Comparison

RSBT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.04%, less than ILS's 8.15% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023
RSBT Return Stacked Bonds & Managed Futures ETF	3.04%	3.20%	0.00%	2.38%
ILS Brookmont Catastrophic Bond ETF	8.15%	6.06%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

RSBT vs. ILS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSBT drawdown since its inception was -23.60%, which is greater than ILS's maximum drawdown of -1.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSBT and ILS.

Drawdown Indicators

	RSBT	ILS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.60%	-1.56%	-22.04%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.17%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.56%	0.00%	-4.56%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.22%	-0.28%	-12.94%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.04%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	RSBT	ILS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.95%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.28%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.95%	3.53%	+11.42%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.90%	3.53%	+10.37%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.90%	3.53%	+10.37%