PortfoliosLab logo
RSBT vs. DBMF
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between RSBT and DBMF is 0.28, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

RSBT vs. DBMF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Return Stacked Bonds & Managed Futures ETF (RSBT) and iM DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF (DBMF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

RSBT:

-0.98

DBMF:

-0.96

Sortino Ratio

RSBT:

-1.15

DBMF:

-1.10

Omega Ratio

RSBT:

0.86

DBMF:

0.86

Calmar Ratio

RSBT:

-0.54

DBMF:

-0.53

Martin Ratio

RSBT:

-1.24

DBMF:

-0.91

Ulcer Index

RSBT:

9.90%

DBMF:

9.61%

Daily Std Dev

RSBT:

13.61%

DBMF:

10.02%

Max Drawdown

RSBT:

-22.81%

DBMF:

-20.39%

Current Drawdown

RSBT:

-21.89%

DBMF:

-14.20%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSBT achieves a -5.70% return, which is significantly lower than DBMF's -2.57% return.


RSBT

YTD

-5.70%

1M

-0.53%

6M

-6.42%

1Y

-13.16%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

DBMF

YTD

-2.57%

1M

1.40%

6M

-3.35%

1Y

-9.51%

5Y*

5.28%

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


RSBT vs. DBMF - Expense Ratio Comparison

RSBT has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than DBMF's 0.85% expense ratio.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

RSBT vs. DBMF — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RSBT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of RSBT is 11
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of RSBT is 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of RSBT is 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of RSBT is 11
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of RSBT is 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of RSBT is 33
Martin Ratio Rank

DBMF
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of DBMF is 22
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of DBMF is 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of DBMF is 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of DBMF is 11
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of DBMF is 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of DBMF is 77
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

RSBT vs. DBMF - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Return Stacked Bonds & Managed Futures ETF (RSBT) and iM DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF (DBMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current RSBT Sharpe Ratio is -0.98, which is comparable to the DBMF Sharpe Ratio of -0.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSBT and DBMF, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

RSBT vs. DBMF - Dividend Comparison

RSBT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DBMF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.03%.


TTM202420232022202120202019
RSBT
Return Stacked Bonds & Managed Futures ETF
0.00%0.00%2.38%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
DBMF
iM DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF
6.03%5.75%2.91%7.72%10.38%0.86%9.35%

Drawdowns

RSBT vs. DBMF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSBT drawdown since its inception was -22.81%, which is greater than DBMF's maximum drawdown of -20.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSBT and DBMF. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

RSBT vs. DBMF - Volatility Comparison

Return Stacked Bonds & Managed Futures ETF (RSBT) has a higher volatility of 3.96% compared to iM DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF (DBMF) at 2.08%. This indicates that RSBT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DBMF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...