PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RSBT vs. GAA
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

RSBT vs. GAA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Return Stacked Bonds & Managed Futures ETF (RSBT) and Cambria Global Asset Allocation ETF (GAA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

RSBT vs. GAA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
RSBT
Return Stacked Bonds & Managed Futures ETF
4.97%10.31%-2.90%-11.91%
GAA
Cambria Global Asset Allocation ETF
4.83%18.76%6.67%5.18%

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with RSBT having a 4.97% return and GAA slightly lower at 4.83%.


RSBT

1D
-0.21%
1M
-3.64%
YTD
4.97%
6M
10.23%
1Y
15.31%
3Y*
2.83%
5Y*
10Y*

GAA

1D
0.91%
1M
-2.65%
YTD
4.83%
6M
8.44%
1Y
20.85%
3Y*
12.32%
5Y*
6.47%
10Y*
7.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


RSBT vs. GAA - Expense Ratio Comparison

RSBT has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than GAA's 0.41% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

RSBT vs. GAA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RSBT
RSBT Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
RSBT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSBT Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSBT Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
RSBT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSBT Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

GAA
GAA Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
GAA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GAA Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
GAA Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
GAA Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
GAA Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RSBT vs. GAA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Return Stacked Bonds & Managed Futures ETF (RSBT) and Cambria Global Asset Allocation ETF (GAA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RSBTGAADifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.03

2.03

-1.00

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.40

2.70

-1.30

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.38

-0.20

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.76

2.87

-1.10

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.94

11.69

-7.75

RSBT vs. GAA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RSBT Sharpe Ratio is 1.03, which is lower than the GAA Sharpe Ratio of 2.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSBT and GAA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RSBTGAADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.03

2.03

-1.00

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.02

0.61

-0.63

Correlation

The correlation between RSBT and GAA is 0.38, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

RSBT vs. GAA - Dividend Comparison

RSBT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.05%, less than GAA's 3.74% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RSBT
Return Stacked Bonds & Managed Futures ETF
3.05%3.20%0.00%2.38%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GAA
Cambria Global Asset Allocation ETF
3.74%4.24%3.88%3.73%6.05%4.21%2.73%3.32%3.01%2.36%2.82%2.49%

Drawdowns

RSBT vs. GAA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSBT drawdown since its inception was -23.60%, smaller than the maximum GAA drawdown of -26.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSBT and GAA.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


RSBTGAADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.60%

-26.57%

+2.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.17%

-7.18%

-0.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.47%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.76%

-3.40%

-1.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.21%

-3.90%

-9.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.66%

1.76%

+1.90%

Volatility

RSBT vs. GAA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Return Stacked Bonds & Managed Futures ETF (RSBT) is 3.35%, while Cambria Global Asset Allocation ETF (GAA) has a volatility of 3.81%. This indicates that RSBT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GAA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


RSBTGAADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.35%

3.81%

-0.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.28%

7.24%

+4.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.95%

10.34%

+4.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.90%

11.27%

+2.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.90%

11.05%

+2.85%