RSBT vs. CTAP
RSBT (Return Stacked Bonds & Managed Futures ETF) and CTAP (Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RSBT is a Nontraditional Bonds fund actively managed by Return Stacked, while CTAP is a Diversified Portfolio fund actively managed by Simplify. Both are actively managed. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RSBT charges 0.97%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for CTAP.
Performance
RSBT vs. CTAP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RSBT achieves a 10.66% return, which is significantly lower than CTAP's 22.34% return.
RSBT
- 1D
- 0.56%
- 1M
- 3.71%
- YTD
- 10.66%
- 6M
- 12.81%
- 1Y
- 28.55%
- 3Y*
- 5.04%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CTAP
- 1D
- 0.68%
- 1M
- -1.60%
- YTD
- 22.34%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RSBT vs. CTAP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
RSBT Return Stacked Bonds & Managed Futures ETF | 10.66% | 2.71% |
CTAP Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF | 22.34% | 2.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between RSBT and CTAP is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2025 | 0.53 |
RSBT vs. CTAP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
RSBT
CTAP
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
RSBT
CTAP
Basic Materials
RSBT
-
CTAP
-
Communication Services
RSBT
-
CTAP
-
Consumer Cyclical
RSBT
-
CTAP
-
Consumer Defensive
RSBT
-
CTAP
-
Energy
RSBT
-
CTAP
-
Healthcare
RSBT
-
CTAP
-
Industrials
RSBT
-
CTAP
-
Real Estate
RSBT
-
CTAP
-
Technology
RSBT
-
CTAP
-
Utilities
RSBT
-
CTAP
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RSBT vs. CTAP — Risk / Return Rank
RSBT
CTAP
RSBT vs. CTAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Return Stacked Bonds & Managed Futures ETF (RSBT) and Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF (CTAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RSBT | CTAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.05 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.67 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.61 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.35 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RSBT | CTAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.05 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.10 | 2.56 | -2.47 |
Drawdowns
RSBT vs. CTAP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RSBT drawdown since its inception was -23.60%, which is greater than CTAP's maximum drawdown of -9.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSBT and CTAP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RSBT | CTAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.60% | -9.02% | -14.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.33% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.98% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -4.16% | +4.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.65% | -2.16% | -10.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.36% | — | — |
Volatility
RSBT vs. CTAP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RSBT | CTAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.08% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.02% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.99% | 24.03% | -10.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.69% | 24.03% | -10.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.69% | 24.03% | -10.34% |
RSBT vs. CTAP - Expense Ratio Comparison
RSBT has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than CTAP's 0.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
RSBT vs. CTAP - Dividend Comparison
RSBT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.89%, more than CTAP's 0.64% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CTAP Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF | 0.64% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RSBT Return Stacked Bonds & Managed Futures ETF | 2.89% | 3.20% | 0.00% | 2.38% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RSBT and CTAP have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CTAP is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CTAP is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for RSBT.
RSBT has the higher dividend yield at 2.89%, compared with 0.64% for CTAP.
RSBT is categorized as Nontraditional Bonds, while CTAP is Diversified Portfolio. They also come from different issuers: Return Stacked and Simplify. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for RSBT and 0.10% for CTAP.
Find the right allocation for RSBT and CTAP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer