RRC vs. SPMO

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

RRC (Range Resources Corporation) is a stock, while SPMO (Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF) is Momentum fund tracking the S&P 500 Momentum Index. Over the past 10 years, RRC returned -0.91%/yr vs 21.44%/yr for SPMO. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

RRC vs. SPMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Range Resources Corporation (RRC) and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RRC achieves a 3.49% return, which is significantly lower than SPMO's 34.38% return. Over the past 10 years, RRC has underperformed SPMO with an annualized return of -0.91%, while SPMO has yielded a comparatively higher 21.44% annualized return.

RRC

• 1D: -0.03%
• 1M: -9.10%
• YTD: 3.49%
• 6M: 3.52%
• 1Y: -10.68%
• 3Y*: 9.79%
• 5Y*: 17.84%
• 10Y*: -0.91%

SPMO

• 1D: 3.80%
• 1M: 6.73%
• YTD: 34.38%
• 6M: 32.02%
• 1Y: 46.41%
• 3Y*: 43.94%
• 5Y*: 23.75%
• 10Y*: 21.44%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RRC vs. SPMO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RRC Range Resources Corporation	3.49%	-1.05%	19.35%	23.05%	41.10%	166.12%	38.14%	-48.60%	-43.60%	-50.15%
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF	34.38%	26.58%	45.82%	17.56%	-10.45%	22.64%	28.25%	25.93%	-0.92%	27.76%

Correlation

The correlation between RRC and SPMO is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.03
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.18
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.30
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.21
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2015	0.19

The correlation between RRC and SPMO shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (1 year) to 0.30 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

RRC vs. SPMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RRC

RRC Risk / Return Rank: 27
RRC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
RRC Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
RRC Omega Ratio Rank: 27
RRC Calmar Ratio Rank: 28
RRC Martin Ratio Rank: 26

SPMO

SPMO Risk / Return Rank: 80
SPMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
SPMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
SPMO Omega Ratio Rank: 80
SPMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
SPMO Martin Ratio Rank: 81

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RRC vs. SPMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Range Resources Corporation (RRC) and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RRC	SPMO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.33	2.24	-2.58
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.26	2.96	-3.22
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.97	1.41	-0.44
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.45	3.67	-4.13
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.87	13.76	-14.63

RRC vs. SPMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RRC Sharpe Ratio is -0.33, which is lower than the SPMO Sharpe Ratio of 2.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RRC and SPMO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RRC vs. SPMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RRC drawdown since its inception was -97.86%, which is greater than SPMO's maximum drawdown of -30.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RRC and SPMO.

Drawdown Indicators

	RRC	SPMO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-97.86%	-30.95%	-66.91%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-23.60%	-12.70%	-10.90%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-28.03%	-20.13%	-7.90%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-37.66%	-22.74%	-14.92%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-95.56%	-30.95%	-64.61%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-58.32%	-1.25%	-57.07%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-46.61%	-4.59%	-42.02%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	12.32%	3.38%	+8.94%

Volatility

RRC vs. SPMO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Range Resources Corporation (RRC) is 7.71%, while Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) has a volatility of 11.90%. This indicates that RRC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RRC	SPMO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.71%	11.90%	-4.19%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	21.89%	18.07%	+3.82%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	32.11%	20.80%	+11.31%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	44.88%	19.94%	+24.94%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	56.43%	20.63%	+35.80%

Dividends

RRC vs. SPMO - Dividend Comparison

RRC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.05%, more than SPMO's 0.66% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
RRC Range Resources Corporation	1.05%	1.02%	0.89%	1.05%	0.64%	0.00%	0.00%	1.65%	0.84%	0.47%	0.23%	0.65%
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF	0.66%	0.73%	0.48%	1.63%	1.66%	0.52%	1.27%	1.39%	1.05%	0.77%	1.94%	0.36%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RRC and SPMO in my portfolio?

RRC and SPMO have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RRC or SPMO?

SPMO has higher volatility (11.90%) compared to RRC (7.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RRC dropped -97.86% vs SPMO's -30.95%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SPMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs -0.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.