PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RR.L vs. NOVN.SW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

RR.L vs. NOVN.SW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC (RR.L) and Novartis AG (NOVN.SW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

RR.L is traded in GBp, while NOVN.SW is traded in CHF. To make them comparable, the NOVN.SW values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with RR.L having a 14.24% return and NOVN.SW slightly higher at 14.56%. Over the past 10 years, RR.L has outperformed NOVN.SW with an annualized return of 20.98%, while NOVN.SW has yielded a comparatively lower 15.47% annualized return.


RR.L

1D
4.41%
1M
8.55%
YTD
14.24%
6M
19.81%
1Y
48.66%
3Y*
106.71%
5Y*
64.05%
10Y*
20.98%

NOVN.SW

1D
0.23%
1M
3.41%
YTD
14.56%
6M
18.78%
1Y
32.48%
3Y*
24.45%
5Y*
20.40%
10Y*
15.47%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RR.L vs. NOVN.SW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RR.L
Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC
14.24%104.79%89.72%221.57%-24.15%10.45%-52.55%-16.52%-0.63%27.42%
NOVN.SW
Novartis AG
14.56%36.16%2.41%33.66%19.70%-2.97%-0.05%26.18%11.89%10.59%

Correlation

The correlation between RR.L and NOVN.SW is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.09

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 6, 2007

0.21

The correlation between RR.L and NOVN.SW shifts across timeframes, from 0.09 (3 years) to 0.21 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RR.L vs. NOVN.SW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RR.L
RR.L Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
RR.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RR.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
RR.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
RR.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
RR.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

NOVN.SW
NOVN.SW Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
NOVN.SW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NOVN.SW Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
NOVN.SW Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
NOVN.SW Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
NOVN.SW Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RR.L vs. NOVN.SW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC (RR.L) and Novartis AG (NOVN.SW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RR.LNOVN.SWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.30

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.54

2.54

+0.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.03

6.36

+0.66

RR.L vs. NOVN.SW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RR.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.34, which is comparable to the NOVN.SW Sharpe Ratio of 1.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RR.L and NOVN.SW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RR.L vs. NOVN.SW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RR.L drawdown since its inception was -90.25%, which is greater than NOVN.SW's maximum drawdown of -30.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RR.L and NOVN.SW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RR.LNOVN.SWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-90.25%

-30.23%

-60.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.04%

-12.98%

-6.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.78%

-15.76%

-6.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-55.09%

-15.76%

-39.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-89.41%

-19.79%

-69.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.61%

-6.47%

+2.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.29%

-7.01%

-21.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.91%

5.16%

+1.75%

Volatility

RR.L vs. NOVN.SW - Volatility Comparison

Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC (RR.L) has a higher volatility of 11.80% compared to Novartis AG (NOVN.SW) at 6.28%. This indicates that RR.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NOVN.SW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RR.LNOVN.SWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.80%

6.28%

+5.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

31.08%

14.19%

+16.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

36.24%

19.45%

+16.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

42.06%

19.54%

+22.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

48.60%

19.49%

+29.11%

Dividends

RR.L vs. NOVN.SW - Dividend Comparison

RR.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.73%, less than NOVN.SW's 3.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NOVN.SW
Novartis AG
3.03%3.19%3.72%3.77%3.71%3.74%3.53%3.10%3.77%3.78%4.12%3.39%
RR.L
Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC
0.73%0.91%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.71%1.41%0.54%1.75%4.06%

Financials

RR.L vs. NOVN.SW - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC and Novartis AG. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Please note, different currencies. RR.L values in GBP, NOVN.SW values in CHF

Frequently Asked Questions


RR.L and NOVN.SW have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RR.L and NOVN.SW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer