EFT vs. BGT
Compare and contrast key facts about Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Income Trust (EFT) and BlackRock Floating Rate Income Trust (BGT).
BGT is managed by Blackrock. It was launched on Aug 26, 2004.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: EFT or BGT.
Correlation
The correlation between EFT and BGT is 0.29, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
EFT vs. BGT - Performance Comparison
Loading data...
Key characteristics
EFT:
-0.08
BGT:
0.10
EFT:
-0.01
BGT:
0.35
EFT:
1.00
BGT:
1.05
EFT:
-0.07
BGT:
0.19
EFT:
-0.27
BGT:
0.67
EFT:
4.23%
BGT:
4.57%
EFT:
14.17%
BGT:
16.63%
EFT:
-60.58%
BGT:
-58.31%
EFT:
-8.90%
BGT:
-6.13%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EFT achieves a -3.79% return, which is significantly lower than BGT's -2.19% return. Over the past 10 years, EFT has underperformed BGT with an annualized return of 5.70%, while BGT has yielded a comparatively higher 6.58% annualized return.
EFT
-3.79%
3.99%
-5.01%
-1.00%
11.10%
5.70%
BGT
-2.19%
4.12%
-2.42%
1.22%
12.20%
6.58%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
EFT vs. BGT — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
EFT
BGT
EFT vs. BGT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Income Trust (EFT) and BlackRock Floating Rate Income Trust (BGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Loading data...
Dividends
EFT vs. BGT - Dividend Comparison
EFT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.59%, less than BGT's 11.93% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFT Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Income Trust | 10.59% | 10.52% | 11.09% | 9.10% | 5.24% | 5.40% | 7.41% | 6.77% | 5.26% | 5.54% | 7.17% | 5.82% |
BGT BlackRock Floating Rate Income Trust | 11.93% | 11.22% | 10.36% | 6.87% | 5.55% | 7.58% | 6.33% | 6.64% | 5.03% | 5.44% | 6.04% | 6.65% |
Drawdowns
EFT vs. BGT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EFT drawdown since its inception was -60.58%, roughly equal to the maximum BGT drawdown of -58.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFT and BGT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Loading data...
Volatility
EFT vs. BGT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Income Trust (EFT) is 3.88%, while BlackRock Floating Rate Income Trust (BGT) has a volatility of 4.52%. This indicates that EFT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading data...