PortfoliosLab logo
EFT vs. PHYSX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between EFT and PHYSX is 0.37, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

EFT vs. PHYSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Income Trust (EFT) and PIA High Yield Fund (PHYSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

EFT:

0.10

PHYSX:

1.29

Sortino Ratio

EFT:

0.34

PHYSX:

1.70

Omega Ratio

EFT:

1.06

PHYSX:

1.31

Calmar Ratio

EFT:

0.15

PHYSX:

0.88

Martin Ratio

EFT:

0.59

PHYSX:

3.26

Ulcer Index

EFT:

4.56%

PHYSX:

1.64%

Daily Std Dev

EFT:

14.14%

PHYSX:

4.11%

Max Drawdown

EFT:

-60.58%

PHYSX:

-19.86%

Current Drawdown

EFT:

-6.30%

PHYSX:

-1.94%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EFT achieves a -1.04% return, which is significantly higher than PHYSX's -1.23% return. Over the past 10 years, EFT has outperformed PHYSX with an annualized return of 5.97%, while PHYSX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.16% annualized return.


EFT

YTD

-1.04%

1M

2.35%

6M

-4.12%

1Y

1.39%

3Y*

10.46%

5Y*

10.05%

10Y*

5.97%

PHYSX

YTD

-1.23%

1M

1.88%

6M

-1.34%

1Y

5.24%

3Y*

6.96%

5Y*

7.09%

10Y*

5.16%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


PIA High Yield Fund

Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

EFT vs. PHYSX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EFT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of EFT is 5454
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of EFT is 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of EFT is 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of EFT is 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of EFT is 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of EFT is 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

PHYSX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of PHYSX is 7878
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of PHYSX is 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of PHYSX is 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of PHYSX is 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of PHYSX is 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of PHYSX is 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

EFT vs. PHYSX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Income Trust (EFT) and PIA High Yield Fund (PHYSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current EFT Sharpe Ratio is 0.10, which is lower than the PHYSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EFT and PHYSX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

EFT vs. PHYSX - Dividend Comparison

EFT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.18%, more than PHYSX's 8.01% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
EFT
Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Income Trust
10.18%10.52%11.09%9.14%5.26%5.40%7.41%6.77%5.26%5.54%7.17%5.82%
PHYSX
PIA High Yield Fund
8.01%7.65%7.42%8.23%6.14%6.31%6.76%6.51%6.37%6.10%6.40%6.32%

Drawdowns

EFT vs. PHYSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EFT drawdown since its inception was -60.58%, which is greater than PHYSX's maximum drawdown of -19.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFT and PHYSX.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

EFT vs. PHYSX - Volatility Comparison

Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Income Trust (EFT) has a higher volatility of 2.52% compared to PIA High Yield Fund (PHYSX) at 1.35%. This indicates that EFT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PHYSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...