RPV vs. VPL
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco S&P 500® Pure Value ETF (RPV) and Vanguard FTSE Pacific ETF (VPL).
RPV and VPL are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. RPV is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P 500/Citigroup Pure Value Index. It was launched on Mar 1, 2006. VPL is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the FTSE Developed Asia Pacific Index. It was launched on Mar 4, 2005. Both RPV and VPL are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
RPV vs. VPL - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RPV vs. VPL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RPV Invesco S&P 500® Pure Value ETF | 4.29% | 17.70% | 12.41% | 7.98% | -1.27% | 34.22% | -8.69% | 24.80% | -12.31% | 17.30% |
VPL Vanguard FTSE Pacific ETF | 10.38% | 32.66% | 1.68% | 15.58% | -15.20% | 1.10% | 16.65% | 18.16% | -14.40% | 28.85% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RPV achieves a 4.29% return, which is significantly lower than VPL's 10.38% return. Over the past 10 years, RPV has outperformed VPL with an annualized return of 10.34%, while VPL has yielded a comparatively lower 9.42% annualized return.
RPV
- 1D
- -0.27%
- 1M
- -3.90%
- YTD
- 4.29%
- 6M
- 8.84%
- 1Y
- 19.27%
- 3Y*
- 14.98%
- 5Y*
- 10.09%
- 10Y*
- 10.34%
VPL
- 1D
- 2.10%
- 1M
- -6.60%
- YTD
- 10.38%
- 6M
- 16.24%
- 1Y
- 42.48%
- 3Y*
- 17.67%
- 5Y*
- 7.30%
- 10Y*
- 9.42%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RPV vs. VPL - Expense Ratio Comparison
RPV has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than VPL's 0.08% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RPV vs. VPL — Risk / Return Rank
RPV
VPL
RPV vs. VPL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500® Pure Value ETF (RPV) and Vanguard FTSE Pacific ETF (VPL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RPV | VPL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.13 | 2.08 | -0.95 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.66 | 2.72 | -1.06 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.41 | -0.18 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.57 | 3.21 | -1.64 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.35 | 12.99 | -6.65 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RPV | VPL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.13 | 2.08 | -0.95 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 | 0.44 | +0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 | 0.55 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.36 | 0.31 | +0.06 |
Correlation
The correlation between RPV and VPL is 0.66, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
RPV vs. VPL - Dividend Comparison
RPV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.42%, less than VPL's 3.22% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RPV Invesco S&P 500® Pure Value ETF | 2.42% | 2.50% | 2.16% | 2.38% | 2.29% | 1.92% | 2.11% | 2.28% | 2.49% | 1.73% | 1.73% | 2.39% |
VPL Vanguard FTSE Pacific ETF | 3.22% | 4.01% | 3.15% | 3.12% | 2.75% | 3.19% | 1.81% | 2.84% | 3.06% | 2.57% | 2.65% | 2.43% |
Drawdowns
RPV vs. VPL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RPV drawdown since its inception was -75.32%, which is greater than VPL's maximum drawdown of -55.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RPV and VPL.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RPV | VPL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -75.32% | -55.49% | -19.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.11% | -13.33% | +1.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.64% | -31.09% | +8.45% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -50.67% | -33.90% | -16.77% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.87% | -8.40% | +3.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.76% | -11.71% | +0.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.00% | 3.29% | -0.29% |
Volatility
RPV vs. VPL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500® Pure Value ETF (RPV) is 3.71%, while Vanguard FTSE Pacific ETF (VPL) has a volatility of 9.81%. This indicates that RPV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VPL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RPV | VPL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.71% | 9.81% | -6.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.73% | 14.85% | -5.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.16% | 20.56% | -3.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.04% | 16.83% | +1.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.97% | 17.11% | +4.86% |