PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RPV vs. VLUE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RPV vs. VLUE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500® Pure Value ETF (RPV) and iShares Edge MSCI USA Value Factor ETF (VLUE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RPV achieves a 11.14% return, which is significantly lower than VLUE's 49.63% return. Over the past 10 years, RPV has underperformed VLUE with an annualized return of 10.71%, while VLUE has yielded a comparatively higher 15.48% annualized return.


RPV

1D
0.28%
1M
3.02%
YTD
11.14%
6M
13.55%
1Y
29.54%
3Y*
18.37%
5Y*
9.43%
10Y*
10.71%

VLUE

1D
1.10%
1M
21.03%
YTD
49.63%
6M
53.55%
1Y
94.60%
3Y*
34.45%
5Y*
16.59%
10Y*
15.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RPV vs. VLUE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RPV
Invesco S&P 500® Pure Value ETF
11.14%17.70%12.41%7.98%-1.27%34.22%-8.69%24.80%-12.31%17.30%
VLUE
iShares Edge MSCI USA Value Factor ETF
49.63%32.67%7.25%14.26%-14.17%28.93%-0.23%27.20%-11.13%21.95%

Correlation

The correlation between RPV and VLUE is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 19, 2013

0.87

Over the past year, the correlation between RPV and VLUE has dropped to 0.62 - well below their long-term average of 0.87, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

RPV vs. VLUE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
RPV
VLUE

Financial Services

17.9%
10.4%

Healthcare

16.2%
8.5%

Consumer Defensive

15.2%
4.0%

Energy

11.3%
3.2%

Consumer Cyclical

10.2%
8.3%

Basic Materials

9.0%
1.6%

Industrials

6.3%
7.4%

Communication Services

5.7%
8.3%

Utilities

4.0%
2.0%

Technology

2.8%
44.5%

Real Estate

1.4%
1.8%

Financial Services

RPV
17.9%
VLUE
10.4%

Healthcare

RPV
16.2%
VLUE
8.5%

Consumer Defensive

RPV
15.2%
VLUE
4.0%

Energy

RPV
11.3%
VLUE
3.2%

Consumer Cyclical

RPV
10.2%
VLUE
8.3%

Basic Materials

RPV
9.0%
VLUE
1.6%

Industrials

RPV
6.3%
VLUE
7.4%

Communication Services

RPV
5.7%
VLUE
8.3%

Utilities

RPV
4.0%
VLUE
2.0%

Technology

RPV
2.8%
VLUE
44.5%

Real Estate

RPV
1.4%
VLUE
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RPV vs. VLUE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RPV
RPV Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
RPV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RPV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
RPV Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
RPV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
RPV Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

VLUE
VLUE Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
VLUE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VLUE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
VLUE Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
VLUE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
VLUE Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RPV vs. VLUE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500® Pure Value ETF (RPV) and iShares Edge MSCI USA Value Factor ETF (VLUE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RPVVLUEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.35

5.50

-3.15

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.39

7.03

-3.64

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.93

-0.53

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.78

10.48

-6.70

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.25

47.09

-33.84

RPV vs. VLUE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RPV Sharpe Ratio is 2.35, which is lower than the VLUE Sharpe Ratio of 5.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RPV and VLUE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RPVVLUEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.35

5.50

-3.15

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

0.94

-0.41

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

0.78

-0.29

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.38

0.76

-0.39

Drawdowns

RPV vs. VLUE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RPV drawdown since its inception was -75.32%, which is greater than VLUE's maximum drawdown of -39.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RPV and VLUE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RPVVLUEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-75.32%

-39.47%

-35.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.74%

-9.04%

+1.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.50%

-17.89%

+2.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.64%

-27.12%

+4.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.67%

-39.47%

-11.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.69%

-6.01%

-4.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.21%

2.01%

+0.20%

Volatility

RPV vs. VLUE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500® Pure Value ETF (RPV) is 2.49%, while iShares Edge MSCI USA Value Factor ETF (VLUE) has a volatility of 7.99%. This indicates that RPV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VLUE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RPVVLUEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.49%

7.99%

-5.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.49%

13.96%

-5.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.61%

17.28%

-4.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.88%

17.78%

+0.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.92%

19.82%

+2.10%

RPV vs. VLUE - Expense Ratio Comparison

RPV has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than VLUE's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

RPV vs. VLUE - Dividend Comparison

RPV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.27%, more than VLUE's 1.39% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RPV
Invesco S&P 500® Pure Value ETF
2.27%2.50%2.16%2.38%2.29%1.92%2.11%2.28%2.49%1.73%1.73%2.39%
VLUE
iShares Edge MSCI USA Value Factor ETF
1.39%2.11%2.73%2.66%3.18%2.22%2.42%2.61%2.70%2.14%2.07%2.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


RPV and VLUE have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VLUE has higher volatility (7.99%) compared to RPV (2.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RPV dropped -75.32% vs VLUE's -39.47%.

On 10-year performance, VLUE leads with 15.48% vs 10.71% for RPV. On fees, VLUE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, RPV has been the lower-risk option at 2.49%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VLUE has performed better with a 15.48% return vs 10.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VLUE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for RPV.

RPV has the higher dividend yield at 2.27%, compared with 1.39% for VLUE.

RPV tracks S&P 500/Citigroup Pure Value Index, while VLUE tracks MSCI USA Value Weighted Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for RPV and 0.15% for VLUE.

VLUE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.50 vs 2.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RPV and VLUE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer