RPV vs. EDIV
RPV (Invesco S&P 500® Pure Value ETF) and EDIV (SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RPV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the S&P 500/Citigroup Pure Value Index, while EDIV is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the S&P Emerging Markets Dividend Opportunities Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, RPV returned 11.35%/yr vs 9.49%/yr for EDIV. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RPV charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for EDIV.
Performance
RPV vs. EDIV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RPV achieves a 14.08% return, which is significantly higher than EDIV's 7.76% return. Over the past 10 years, RPV has outperformed EDIV with an annualized return of 11.35%, while EDIV has yielded a comparatively lower 9.49% annualized return.
RPV
- 1D
- 1.37%
- 1M
- 5.27%
- YTD
- 14.08%
- 6M
- 12.72%
- 1Y
- 30.18%
- 3Y*
- 17.75%
- 5Y*
- 10.40%
- 10Y*
- 11.35%
EDIV
- 1D
- 0.70%
- 1M
- 0.99%
- YTD
- 7.76%
- 6M
- 9.12%
- 1Y
- 13.72%
- 3Y*
- 18.11%
- 5Y*
- 10.84%
- 10Y*
- 9.49%
RPV vs. EDIV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RPV Invesco S&P 500® Pure Value ETF | 14.08% | 17.70% | 12.41% | 7.98% | -1.27% | 34.22% | -8.69% | 24.80% | -12.31% | 17.30% |
EDIV SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF | 7.76% | 16.45% | 12.75% | 41.91% | -15.31% | 11.21% | -9.95% | 11.80% | -6.16% | 28.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between RPV and EDIV is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2011 | 0.58 |
The correlation between RPV and EDIV shifts across timeframes, from 0.39 (1 year) to 0.58 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
RPV vs. EDIV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
RPV
EDIV
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Industrials
Communication Services
Utilities
Technology
Real Estate
Financial Services
RPV
EDIV
Healthcare
RPV
EDIV
Consumer Defensive
RPV
EDIV
Energy
RPV
EDIV
Consumer Cyclical
RPV
EDIV
Basic Materials
RPV
EDIV
Industrials
RPV
EDIV
Communication Services
RPV
EDIV
Utilities
RPV
EDIV
Technology
RPV
EDIV
Real Estate
RPV
EDIV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RPV vs. EDIV — Risk / Return Rank
RPV
EDIV
RPV vs. EDIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500® Pure Value ETF (RPV) and SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF (EDIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RPV | EDIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.85 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.21 | +0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.92 | 1.33 | +2.59 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.71 | 4.01 | +9.70 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RPV vs. EDIV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RPV drawdown since its inception was -75.32%, which is greater than EDIV's maximum drawdown of -53.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RPV and EDIV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RPV | EDIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -75.32% | -53.36% | -21.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.74% | -10.36% | +2.62% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.50% | -13.84% | -1.66% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.64% | -28.32% | +5.68% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -50.67% | -40.76% | -9.91% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -2.86% | +2.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.67% | -19.33% | +8.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.21% | 3.43% | -1.22% |
Volatility
RPV vs. EDIV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500® Pure Value ETF (RPV) is 2.88%, while SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF (EDIV) has a volatility of 4.64%. This indicates that RPV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EDIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RPV | EDIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.88% | 4.64% | -1.76% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.56% | 10.57% | -2.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.66% | 12.64% | +0.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.88% | 13.90% | +3.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.91% | 17.49% | +4.42% |
RPV vs. EDIV - Expense Ratio Comparison
RPV has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than EDIV's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
RPV vs. EDIV - Dividend Comparison
RPV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.21%, less than EDIV's 4.45% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EDIV SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF | 4.45% | 4.69% | 3.94% | 4.26% | 4.94% | 3.84% | 3.52% | 3.83% | 3.41% | 2.99% | 4.94% | 5.33% |
RPV Invesco S&P 500® Pure Value ETF | 2.21% | 2.50% | 2.16% | 2.38% | 2.29% | 1.92% | 2.11% | 2.28% | 2.49% | 1.73% | 1.73% | 2.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RPV and EDIV have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EDIV has higher volatility (4.64%) compared to RPV (2.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RPV dropped -75.32% vs EDIV's -53.36%.
On 10-year performance, RPV leads with 11.35% vs 9.49% for EDIV. On fees, RPV is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, RPV has been the lower-risk option at 2.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, RPV has performed better with a 11.35% return vs 9.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RPV is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for EDIV.
EDIV has the higher dividend yield at 4.45%, compared with 2.21% for RPV.
RPV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while EDIV is Emerging Markets Equities. RPV tracks S&P 500/Citigroup Pure Value Index, while EDIV tracks S&P Emerging Markets Dividend Opportunities Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for RPV and 0.49% for EDIV.
RPV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.40 vs 1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RPV and EDIV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer