PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RPV vs. EDIV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RPV vs. EDIV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500® Pure Value ETF (RPV) and SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF (EDIV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RPV achieves a 14.08% return, which is significantly higher than EDIV's 7.76% return. Over the past 10 years, RPV has outperformed EDIV with an annualized return of 11.35%, while EDIV has yielded a comparatively lower 9.49% annualized return.


RPV

1D
1.37%
1M
5.27%
YTD
14.08%
6M
12.72%
1Y
30.18%
3Y*
17.75%
5Y*
10.40%
10Y*
11.35%

EDIV

1D
0.70%
1M
0.99%
YTD
7.76%
6M
9.12%
1Y
13.72%
3Y*
18.11%
5Y*
10.84%
10Y*
9.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RPV vs. EDIV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RPV
Invesco S&P 500® Pure Value ETF
14.08%17.70%12.41%7.98%-1.27%34.22%-8.69%24.80%-12.31%17.30%
EDIV
SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF
7.76%16.45%12.75%41.91%-15.31%11.21%-9.95%11.80%-6.16%28.20%

Correlation

The correlation between RPV and EDIV is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.41

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2011

0.58

The correlation between RPV and EDIV shifts across timeframes, from 0.39 (1 year) to 0.58 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

RPV vs. EDIV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
RPV
EDIV

Financial Services

17.9%
29.7%

Healthcare

16.2%
1.3%

Consumer Defensive

15.2%
12.8%

Energy

11.3%
3.2%

Consumer Cyclical

10.2%
11.8%

Basic Materials

9.0%
1.7%

Industrials

6.3%
9.7%

Communication Services

5.7%
13.8%

Utilities

4.0%
2.5%

Technology

2.8%
8.4%

Real Estate

1.4%
5.1%

Financial Services

RPV
17.9%
EDIV
29.7%

Healthcare

RPV
16.2%
EDIV
1.3%

Consumer Defensive

RPV
15.2%
EDIV
12.8%

Energy

RPV
11.3%
EDIV
3.2%

Consumer Cyclical

RPV
10.2%
EDIV
11.8%

Basic Materials

RPV
9.0%
EDIV
1.7%

Industrials

RPV
6.3%
EDIV
9.7%

Communication Services

RPV
5.7%
EDIV
13.8%

Utilities

RPV
4.0%
EDIV
2.5%

Technology

RPV
2.8%
EDIV
8.4%

Real Estate

RPV
1.4%
EDIV
5.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RPV vs. EDIV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RPV
RPV Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
RPV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RPV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
RPV Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
RPV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
RPV Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

EDIV
EDIV Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
EDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
EDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
EDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
EDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RPV vs. EDIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500® Pure Value ETF (RPV) and SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF (EDIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RPVEDIVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.85

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.21

+0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.92

1.33

+2.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.71

4.01

+9.70

RPV vs. EDIV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RPV Sharpe Ratio is 2.40, which is higher than the EDIV Sharpe Ratio of 1.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RPV and EDIV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RPV vs. EDIV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RPV drawdown since its inception was -75.32%, which is greater than EDIV's maximum drawdown of -53.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RPV and EDIV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RPVEDIVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-75.32%

-53.36%

-21.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.74%

-10.36%

+2.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.50%

-13.84%

-1.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.64%

-28.32%

+5.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.67%

-40.76%

-9.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-2.86%

+2.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.67%

-19.33%

+8.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.21%

3.43%

-1.22%

Volatility

RPV vs. EDIV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500® Pure Value ETF (RPV) is 2.88%, while SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF (EDIV) has a volatility of 4.64%. This indicates that RPV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EDIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RPVEDIVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.88%

4.64%

-1.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.56%

10.57%

-2.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.66%

12.64%

+0.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.88%

13.90%

+3.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.91%

17.49%

+4.42%

RPV vs. EDIV - Expense Ratio Comparison

RPV has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than EDIV's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

RPV vs. EDIV - Dividend Comparison

RPV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.21%, less than EDIV's 4.45% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EDIV
SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF
4.45%4.69%3.94%4.26%4.94%3.84%3.52%3.83%3.41%2.99%4.94%5.33%
RPV
Invesco S&P 500® Pure Value ETF
2.21%2.50%2.16%2.38%2.29%1.92%2.11%2.28%2.49%1.73%1.73%2.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


RPV and EDIV have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EDIV has higher volatility (4.64%) compared to RPV (2.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RPV dropped -75.32% vs EDIV's -53.36%.

On 10-year performance, RPV leads with 11.35% vs 9.49% for EDIV. On fees, RPV is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, RPV has been the lower-risk option at 2.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, RPV has performed better with a 11.35% return vs 9.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

RPV is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for EDIV.

EDIV has the higher dividend yield at 4.45%, compared with 2.21% for RPV.

RPV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while EDIV is Emerging Markets Equities. RPV tracks S&P 500/Citigroup Pure Value Index, while EDIV tracks S&P Emerging Markets Dividend Opportunities Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for RPV and 0.49% for EDIV.

RPV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.40 vs 1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RPV and EDIV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer