RPMGX vs. TAAGX
Compare and contrast key facts about T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth Fund (RPMGX) and Timothy Plan Aggressive Growth Fund (TAAGX).
RPMGX is managed by T. Rowe Price. It was launched on Jun 30, 1992. TAAGX is managed by Timothy Plan. It was launched on Oct 5, 2000.
Performance
RPMGX vs. TAAGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RPMGX vs. TAAGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RPMGX T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth Fund | -4.07% | 10.55% | 21.08% | 20.27% | -22.51% | 14.94% | 24.16% | 31.53% | -2.12% | 24.80% |
TAAGX Timothy Plan Aggressive Growth Fund | 10.71% | 16.01% | 25.45% | 26.46% | -25.98% | 17.90% | 36.11% | 27.71% | -12.17% | 19.12% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RPMGX achieves a -4.07% return, which is significantly lower than TAAGX's 10.71% return. Over the past 10 years, RPMGX has underperformed TAAGX with an annualized return of 11.27%, while TAAGX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.08% annualized return.
RPMGX
- 1D
- 2.79%
- 1M
- -6.50%
- YTD
- -4.07%
- 6M
- 3.44%
- 1Y
- 13.97%
- 3Y*
- 12.93%
- 5Y*
- 5.64%
- 10Y*
- 11.27%
TAAGX
- 1D
- 4.08%
- 1M
- -4.43%
- YTD
- 10.71%
- 6M
- 13.01%
- 1Y
- 48.03%
- 3Y*
- 22.34%
- 5Y*
- 11.13%
- 10Y*
- 13.08%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RPMGX vs. TAAGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
RPMGX has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is lower than TAAGX's 1.61% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RPMGX vs. TAAGX — Risk / Return Rank
RPMGX
TAAGX
RPMGX vs. TAAGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth Fund (RPMGX) and Timothy Plan Aggressive Growth Fund (TAAGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RPMGX | TAAGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.72 | 2.01 | -1.28 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.20 | 2.66 | -1.46 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.36 | -0.20 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.13 | 4.06 | -2.93 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.47 | 17.43 | -12.96 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RPMGX | TAAGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.72 | 2.01 | -1.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 | 0.49 | -0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.59 | 0.60 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.67 | 0.23 | +0.44 |
Correlation
The correlation between RPMGX and TAAGX is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
RPMGX vs. TAAGX - Dividend Comparison
RPMGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.24%, more than TAAGX's 3.10% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RPMGX T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth Fund | 13.24% | 12.70% | 20.43% | 6.35% | 2.60% | 10.52% | 4.53% | 5.29% | 12.12% | 8.04% | 3.45% | 9.51% |
TAAGX Timothy Plan Aggressive Growth Fund | 3.10% | 3.44% | 8.81% | 3.12% | 3.06% | 8.89% | 5.75% | 0.00% | 7.57% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 15.71% |
Drawdowns
RPMGX vs. TAAGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RPMGX drawdown since its inception was -54.66%, smaller than the maximum TAAGX drawdown of -62.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RPMGX and TAAGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RPMGX | TAAGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.66% | -62.13% | +7.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.47% | -12.13% | -0.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.08% | -34.47% | +2.39% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.96% | -34.47% | -1.49% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.71% | -5.56% | -2.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.99% | -18.82% | +11.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.16% | 2.83% | +0.33% |
Volatility
RPMGX vs. TAAGX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth Fund (RPMGX) is 5.75%, while Timothy Plan Aggressive Growth Fund (TAAGX) has a volatility of 9.62%. This indicates that RPMGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TAAGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RPMGX | TAAGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.75% | 9.62% | -3.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.80% | 16.80% | -5.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.72% | 24.69% | -4.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.27% | 22.94% | -3.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.06% | 22.02% | -2.96% |