TAAGX vs. BUG
TAAGX (Timothy Plan Aggressive Growth Fund) and BUG (Global X Cybersecurity ETF) are both funds - TAAGX is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Timothy Plan, while BUG is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Indxx Cybersecurity Index. Over the past 5 years, TAAGX returned 18.07%/yr vs 3.22%/yr for BUG. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TAAGX charges 1.61%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for BUG.
Performance
TAAGX vs. BUG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TAAGX achieves a 39.80% return, which is significantly higher than BUG's 9.36% return.
TAAGX
- 1D
- 2.22%
- 1M
- 7.39%
- YTD
- 39.80%
- 6M
- 37.61%
- 1Y
- 64.86%
- 3Y*
- 34.69%
- 5Y*
- 18.07%
- 10Y*
- 16.71%
BUG
- 1D
- -1.71%
- 1M
- -3.03%
- YTD
- 9.36%
- 6M
- 5.82%
- 1Y
- -6.40%
- 3Y*
- 12.25%
- 5Y*
- 3.22%
- 10Y*
- —
TAAGX vs. BUG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TAAGX Timothy Plan Aggressive Growth Fund | 39.80% | 16.01% | 36.81% | 26.46% | -25.98% | 17.90% | 36.11% | 7.13% |
BUG Global X Cybersecurity ETF | 9.36% | -5.04% | 9.59% | 41.40% | -33.63% | 13.24% | 70.83% | 6.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between TAAGX and BUG is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2019 | 0.71 |
Over the past year, the correlation between TAAGX and BUG has dropped to 0.32 - well below their long-term average of 0.71, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TAAGX vs. BUG — Risk / Return Rank
TAAGX
BUG
TAAGX vs. BUG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Timothy Plan Aggressive Growth Fund (TAAGX) and Global X Cybersecurity ETF (BUG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TAAGX | BUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.74 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 0.99 | +0.49 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.04 | -0.17 | +7.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 27.01 | -0.35 | +27.35 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TAAGX vs. BUG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TAAGX drawdown since its inception was -62.13%, which is greater than BUG's maximum drawdown of -41.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TAAGX and BUG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TAAGX | BUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.13% | -41.66% | -20.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.26% | -37.69% | +28.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.24% | -37.69% | +8.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.47% | -41.66% | +7.19% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.47% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -13.59% | +13.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.66% | -14.39% | -4.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.41% | 18.52% | -16.11% |
Volatility
TAAGX vs. BUG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Timothy Plan Aggressive Growth Fund (TAAGX) is 9.06%, while Global X Cybersecurity ETF (BUG) has a volatility of 13.78%. This indicates that TAAGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BUG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TAAGX | BUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.06% | 13.78% | -4.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.33% | 26.15% | -7.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.24% | 31.20% | -8.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.62% | 28.54% | -4.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.43% | 29.30% | -6.87% |
TAAGX vs. BUG - Expense Ratio Comparison
TAAGX has a 1.61% expense ratio, which is higher than BUG's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
TAAGX vs. BUG - Dividend Comparison
TAAGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.46%, more than BUG's 0.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BUG Global X Cybersecurity ETF | 0.04% | 0.04% | 0.09% | 0.10% | 1.56% | 0.66% | 0.46% | 0.24% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TAAGX Timothy Plan Aggressive Growth Fund | 2.46% | 3.44% | 17.62% | 3.12% | 3.06% | 8.89% | 5.75% | 0.00% | 7.57% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 15.71% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TAAGX and BUG have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BUG has higher volatility (13.78%) compared to TAAGX (9.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TAAGX dropped -62.13% vs BUG's -41.66%.
TAAGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.93 vs -0.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TAAGX and BUG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer