RPLCX vs. TRLGX
Compare and contrast key facts about T. Rowe Price Institutional Long Duration Credit Fund (RPLCX) and T. Rowe Price Large-Cap Growth Fund (TRLGX).
RPLCX is managed by T. Rowe Price. It was launched on Jun 2, 2013. TRLGX is managed by T. Rowe Price. It was launched on Oct 31, 2001.
Performance
RPLCX vs. TRLGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RPLCX vs. TRLGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RPLCX T. Rowe Price Institutional Long Duration Credit Fund | -1.66% | 7.65% | -1.84% | 9.05% | -27.00% | -0.19% | 16.73% | 23.72% | -6.27% | 11.03% |
TRLGX T. Rowe Price Large-Cap Growth Fund | -11.46% | 17.51% | 37.57% | 46.22% | -35.26% | 23.24% | 39.57% | 28.51% | 4.35% | 37.77% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RPLCX achieves a -1.66% return, which is significantly higher than TRLGX's -11.46% return. Over the past 10 years, RPLCX has underperformed TRLGX with an annualized return of 2.29%, while TRLGX has yielded a comparatively higher 16.72% annualized return.
RPLCX
- 1D
- 0.54%
- 1M
- -3.14%
- YTD
- -1.66%
- 6M
- -1.77%
- 1Y
- 2.65%
- 3Y*
- 2.30%
- 5Y*
- -2.33%
- 10Y*
- 2.29%
TRLGX
- 1D
- 3.95%
- 1M
- -5.81%
- YTD
- -11.46%
- 6M
- -10.30%
- 1Y
- 12.15%
- 3Y*
- 22.38%
- 5Y*
- 9.59%
- 10Y*
- 16.72%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RPLCX vs. TRLGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
RPLCX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than TRLGX's 0.55% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RPLCX vs. TRLGX — Risk / Return Rank
RPLCX
TRLGX
RPLCX vs. TRLGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Institutional Long Duration Credit Fund (RPLCX) and T. Rowe Price Large-Cap Growth Fund (TRLGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RPLCX | TRLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.37 | 0.59 | -0.22 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.56 | 1.02 | -0.46 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.14 | -0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.70 | 0.55 | +0.16 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.80 | 1.83 | -0.03 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RPLCX | TRLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 | 0.59 | -0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.20 | 0.43 | -0.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.22 | 0.77 | -0.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.34 | 0.55 | -0.21 |
Correlation
The correlation between RPLCX and TRLGX is -0.02. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
RPLCX vs. TRLGX - Dividend Comparison
RPLCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.98%, less than TRLGX's 15.46% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RPLCX T. Rowe Price Institutional Long Duration Credit Fund | 4.98% | 5.32% | 5.17% | 4.15% | 3.54% | 6.09% | 7.16% | 13.58% | 4.33% | 4.07% | 3.79% | 4.70% |
TRLGX T. Rowe Price Large-Cap Growth Fund | 15.46% | 13.69% | 9.80% | 2.04% | 3.88% | 2.56% | 0.42% | 4.09% | 7.93% | 9.27% | 1.64% | 4.71% |
Drawdowns
RPLCX vs. TRLGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RPLCX drawdown since its inception was -35.21%, smaller than the maximum TRLGX drawdown of -55.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RPLCX and TRLGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RPLCX | TRLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.21% | -55.56% | +20.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.80% | -18.18% | +12.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.21% | -40.44% | +5.23% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.21% | -40.44% | +5.23% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.88% | -14.94% | -3.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.02% | -8.71% | -1.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.27% | 5.43% | -3.16% |
Volatility
RPLCX vs. TRLGX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for T. Rowe Price Institutional Long Duration Credit Fund (RPLCX) is 3.35%, while T. Rowe Price Large-Cap Growth Fund (TRLGX) has a volatility of 7.19%. This indicates that RPLCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TRLGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RPLCX | TRLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.35% | 7.19% | -3.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.21% | 12.51% | -7.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.79% | 22.17% | -13.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.64% | 22.41% | -10.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.59% | 21.73% | -11.14% |