RPLCX vs. TRBFX
Compare and contrast key facts about T. Rowe Price Institutional Long Duration Credit Fund (RPLCX) and T. Rowe Price Limited Duration Inflation Focused Bond Fund (TRBFX).
RPLCX is managed by T. Rowe Price. It was launched on Jun 2, 2013. TRBFX is managed by T. Rowe Price. It was launched on Sep 28, 2006.
Performance
RPLCX vs. TRBFX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RPLCX vs. TRBFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RPLCX T. Rowe Price Institutional Long Duration Credit Fund | -1.66% | 7.65% | -1.84% | 9.05% | -27.00% | -0.19% | 16.73% | 23.72% | -6.27% | 11.03% |
TRBFX T. Rowe Price Limited Duration Inflation Focused Bond Fund | 0.71% | 10.17% | 4.60% | 3.01% | -5.19% | 5.77% | 5.65% | 6.53% | 0.28% | 0.80% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RPLCX achieves a -1.66% return, which is significantly lower than TRBFX's 0.71% return. Over the past 10 years, RPLCX has underperformed TRBFX with an annualized return of 2.29%, while TRBFX has yielded a comparatively higher 3.22% annualized return.
RPLCX
- 1D
- 0.54%
- 1M
- -3.14%
- YTD
- -1.66%
- 6M
- -1.77%
- 1Y
- 2.65%
- 3Y*
- 2.30%
- 5Y*
- -2.33%
- 10Y*
- 2.29%
TRBFX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.21%
- YTD
- 0.71%
- 6M
- 4.30%
- 1Y
- 7.56%
- 3Y*
- 5.46%
- 5Y*
- 3.34%
- 10Y*
- 3.22%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RPLCX vs. TRBFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
RPLCX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than TRBFX's 0.41% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RPLCX vs. TRBFX — Risk / Return Rank
RPLCX
TRBFX
RPLCX vs. TRBFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Institutional Long Duration Credit Fund (RPLCX) and T. Rowe Price Limited Duration Inflation Focused Bond Fund (TRBFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RPLCX | TRBFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.37 | 1.79 | -1.42 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.56 | 4.04 | -3.48 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.64 | -0.57 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.70 | 6.72 | -6.02 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.80 | 21.47 | -19.67 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RPLCX | TRBFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 | 1.79 | -1.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.20 | 0.68 | -0.88 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.22 | 0.83 | -0.62 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.34 | 0.82 | -0.48 |
Correlation
The correlation between RPLCX and TRBFX is 0.42, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
RPLCX vs. TRBFX - Dividend Comparison
RPLCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.98%, less than TRBFX's 8.46% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RPLCX T. Rowe Price Institutional Long Duration Credit Fund | 4.98% | 5.32% | 5.17% | 4.15% | 3.54% | 6.09% | 7.16% | 13.58% | 4.33% | 4.07% | 3.79% | 4.70% |
TRBFX T. Rowe Price Limited Duration Inflation Focused Bond Fund | 8.46% | 8.56% | 4.48% | 3.64% | 6.11% | 4.99% | 1.38% | 3.27% | 2.34% | 1.61% | 1.10% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
RPLCX vs. TRBFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RPLCX drawdown since its inception was -35.21%, which is greater than TRBFX's maximum drawdown of -7.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RPLCX and TRBFX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RPLCX | TRBFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.21% | -7.33% | -27.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.80% | -1.24% | -4.56% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.21% | -7.33% | -27.88% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.21% | -7.33% | -27.88% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.88% | -0.63% | -18.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.02% | -1.34% | -8.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.27% | 0.39% | +1.88% |
Volatility
RPLCX vs. TRBFX - Volatility Comparison
T. Rowe Price Institutional Long Duration Credit Fund (RPLCX) has a higher volatility of 3.35% compared to T. Rowe Price Limited Duration Inflation Focused Bond Fund (TRBFX) at 0.83%. This indicates that RPLCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TRBFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RPLCX | TRBFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.35% | 0.83% | +2.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.21% | 3.52% | +1.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.79% | 4.25% | +4.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.64% | 4.97% | +6.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.59% | 3.89% | +6.70% |