PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RPLCX vs. TRBUX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RPLCX vs. TRBUX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Institutional Long Duration Credit Fund (RPLCX) and T. Rowe Price Ultra Short-Term Bond Fund (TRBUX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RPLCX achieves a 0.77% return, which is significantly lower than TRBUX's 1.39% return. Over the past 10 years, RPLCX has underperformed TRBUX with an annualized return of 2.18%, while TRBUX has yielded a comparatively higher 3.29% annualized return.


RPLCX

1D
-0.53%
1M
1.96%
YTD
0.77%
6M
1.24%
1Y
6.89%
3Y*
3.73%
5Y*
-2.74%
10Y*
2.18%

TRBUX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.36%
YTD
1.39%
6M
2.18%
1Y
6.22%
3Y*
6.68%
5Y*
4.28%
10Y*
3.29%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RPLCX vs. TRBUX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RPLCX
T. Rowe Price Institutional Long Duration Credit Fund
0.77%7.65%-1.84%9.05%-27.00%-0.19%16.73%23.72%-6.27%11.03%
TRBUX
T. Rowe Price Ultra Short-Term Bond Fund
1.39%6.88%7.88%6.99%-1.28%0.22%3.11%3.60%1.88%1.83%

Correlation

The correlation between RPLCX and TRBUX is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.28

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.28

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2014

0.29

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RPLCX vs. TRBUX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RPLCX
RPLCX Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
RPLCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RPLCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
RPLCX Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
RPLCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
RPLCX Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

TRBUX
TRBUX Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
TRBUX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRBUX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRBUX Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
TRBUX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRBUX Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RPLCX vs. TRBUX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Institutional Long Duration Credit Fund (RPLCX) and T. Rowe Price Ultra Short-Term Bond Fund (TRBUX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RPLCXTRBUXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.76

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-7.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

3.56

-2.40

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.39

16.38

-14.99

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.78

61.02

-57.24

RPLCX vs. TRBUX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RPLCX Sharpe Ratio is 0.93, which is lower than the TRBUX Sharpe Ratio of 3.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RPLCX and TRBUX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RPLCX vs. TRBUX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RPLCX drawdown since its inception was -35.21%, which is greater than TRBUX's maximum drawdown of -4.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RPLCX and TRBUX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RPLCXTRBUXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.21%

-4.15%

-31.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.19%

-0.39%

-4.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.32%

-0.78%

-12.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.21%

-2.68%

-32.53%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.21%

-4.15%

-31.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.87%

-0.20%

-16.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.15%

-0.21%

-9.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.90%

0.10%

+1.80%

Volatility

RPLCX vs. TRBUX - Volatility Comparison

T. Rowe Price Institutional Long Duration Credit Fund (RPLCX) has a higher volatility of 2.14% compared to T. Rowe Price Ultra Short-Term Bond Fund (TRBUX) at 0.58%. This indicates that RPLCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TRBUX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RPLCXTRBUXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.14%

0.58%

+1.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.71%

1.19%

+4.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.76%

1.75%

+6.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.63%

1.69%

+9.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.60%

1.51%

+9.09%

RPLCX vs. TRBUX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RPLCX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than TRBUX's 0.31% expense ratio.


Dividends

RPLCX vs. TRBUX - Dividend Comparison

RPLCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.36%, less than TRBUX's 6.04% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RPLCX
T. Rowe Price Institutional Long Duration Credit Fund
5.36%5.32%5.17%4.15%3.54%6.09%7.16%13.58%4.33%4.07%3.79%4.70%
TRBUX
T. Rowe Price Ultra Short-Term Bond Fund
6.04%6.23%6.36%4.48%1.53%1.21%1.86%2.73%2.47%1.62%1.18%0.81%

Frequently Asked Questions


RPLCX and TRBUX have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RPLCX has higher volatility (2.14%) compared to TRBUX (0.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RPLCX dropped -35.21% vs TRBUX's -4.15%.

TRBUX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.69 vs 0.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RPLCX and TRBUX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer