RPLCX vs. LDRAX
Compare and contrast key facts about T. Rowe Price Institutional Long Duration Credit Fund (RPLCX) and SEI Institutional Investments Trust Long Duration Fund (LDRAX).
RPLCX is managed by T. Rowe Price. It was launched on Jun 2, 2013. LDRAX is managed by SEI. It was launched on Apr 20, 2004.
Performance
RPLCX vs. LDRAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RPLCX vs. LDRAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RPLCX T. Rowe Price Institutional Long Duration Credit Fund | -1.66% | 7.65% | -1.84% | 9.05% | -27.00% | -0.19% | 16.73% | 23.72% | -6.27% | 11.03% |
LDRAX SEI Institutional Investments Trust Long Duration Fund | -1.23% | 6.81% | -3.28% | 7.16% | -27.73% | -2.19% | 18.23% | 21.19% | -5.16% | 11.74% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RPLCX achieves a -1.66% return, which is significantly lower than LDRAX's -1.23% return. Over the past 10 years, RPLCX has outperformed LDRAX with an annualized return of 2.29%, while LDRAX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.61% annualized return.
RPLCX
- 1D
- 0.54%
- 1M
- -3.14%
- YTD
- -1.66%
- 6M
- -1.77%
- 1Y
- 2.65%
- 3Y*
- 2.30%
- 5Y*
- -2.33%
- 10Y*
- 2.29%
LDRAX
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- -3.19%
- YTD
- -1.23%
- 6M
- -1.82%
- 1Y
- 1.39%
- 3Y*
- 0.94%
- 5Y*
- -3.27%
- 10Y*
- 1.61%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RPLCX vs. LDRAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
RPLCX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than LDRAX's 0.14% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RPLCX vs. LDRAX — Risk / Return Rank
RPLCX
LDRAX
RPLCX vs. LDRAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Institutional Long Duration Credit Fund (RPLCX) and SEI Institutional Investments Trust Long Duration Fund (LDRAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RPLCX | LDRAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.37 | 0.23 | +0.14 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.56 | 0.37 | +0.19 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.05 | +0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.70 | 0.50 | +0.21 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.80 | 1.22 | +0.57 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RPLCX | LDRAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 | 0.23 | +0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.20 | -0.26 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.22 | 0.14 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.34 | 0.13 | +0.21 |
Correlation
The correlation between RPLCX and LDRAX is 0.96, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
RPLCX vs. LDRAX - Dividend Comparison
RPLCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.98%, more than LDRAX's 4.72% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RPLCX T. Rowe Price Institutional Long Duration Credit Fund | 4.98% | 5.32% | 5.17% | 4.15% | 3.54% | 6.09% | 7.16% | 13.58% | 4.33% | 4.07% | 3.79% | 4.70% |
LDRAX SEI Institutional Investments Trust Long Duration Fund | 4.72% | 5.04% | 4.62% | 3.42% | 3.23% | 4.30% | 12.32% | 8.60% | 4.80% | 4.46% | 6.21% | 9.23% |
Drawdowns
RPLCX vs. LDRAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RPLCX drawdown since its inception was -35.21%, smaller than the maximum LDRAX drawdown of -37.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RPLCX and LDRAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RPLCX | LDRAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.21% | -37.23% | +2.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.80% | -6.13% | +0.33% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.21% | -36.35% | +1.14% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.21% | -37.23% | +2.02% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.88% | -23.78% | +4.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.02% | -12.31% | +2.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.27% | 2.48% | -0.21% |
Volatility
RPLCX vs. LDRAX - Volatility Comparison
T. Rowe Price Institutional Long Duration Credit Fund (RPLCX) and SEI Institutional Investments Trust Long Duration Fund (LDRAX) have volatilities of 3.35% and 3.47%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RPLCX | LDRAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.35% | 3.47% | -0.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.21% | 5.36% | -0.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.79% | 9.17% | -0.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.64% | 12.56% | -0.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.59% | 11.40% | -0.81% |