PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RPLCX vs. LDRAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RPLCX vs. LDRAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Institutional Long Duration Credit Fund (RPLCX) and SEI Institutional Investments Trust Long Duration Fund (LDRAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RPLCX achieves a 0.77% return, which is significantly higher than LDRAX's 0.43% return. Over the past 10 years, RPLCX has outperformed LDRAX with an annualized return of 2.22%, while LDRAX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.43% annualized return.


RPLCX

1D
0.00%
1M
1.00%
YTD
0.77%
6M
0.71%
1Y
8.81%
3Y*
3.95%
5Y*
-2.22%
10Y*
2.22%

LDRAX

1D
-0.17%
1M
0.79%
YTD
0.43%
6M
-0.32%
1Y
7.06%
3Y*
2.45%
5Y*
-3.23%
10Y*
1.43%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RPLCX vs. LDRAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RPLCX
T. Rowe Price Institutional Long Duration Credit Fund
0.77%7.65%-1.84%9.05%-27.00%-0.19%16.73%23.72%-6.27%11.03%
LDRAX
SEI Institutional Investments Trust Long Duration Fund
0.43%6.81%-3.28%7.16%-27.73%-2.19%18.23%21.19%-5.16%11.74%

Correlation

The correlation between RPLCX and LDRAX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2014

0.96

The correlation between RPLCX and LDRAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RPLCX vs. LDRAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RPLCX
RPLCX Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
RPLCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RPLCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
RPLCX Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
RPLCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
RPLCX Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

LDRAX
LDRAX Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
LDRAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LDRAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
LDRAX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
LDRAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
LDRAX Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RPLCX vs. LDRAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Institutional Long Duration Credit Fund (RPLCX) and SEI Institutional Investments Trust Long Duration Fund (LDRAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RPLCXLDRAXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.04

0.79

+0.25

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.56

1.17

+0.39

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.14

+0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.61

1.31

+0.30

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.48

3.30

+1.18

RPLCX vs. LDRAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RPLCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.04, which is higher than the LDRAX Sharpe Ratio of 0.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RPLCX and LDRAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RPLCXLDRAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.04

0.79

+0.25

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.19

-0.26

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.21

0.13

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.35

0.13

+0.22

Drawdowns

RPLCX vs. LDRAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RPLCX drawdown since its inception was -35.21%, smaller than the maximum LDRAX drawdown of -37.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RPLCX and LDRAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RPLCXLDRAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.21%

-37.23%

+2.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.19%

-5.34%

+0.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.32%

-14.49%

+1.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.21%

-36.35%

+1.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.21%

-37.23%

+2.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.87%

-22.50%

+5.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.12%

-12.39%

+2.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.87%

2.12%

-0.25%

Volatility

RPLCX vs. LDRAX - Volatility Comparison

T. Rowe Price Institutional Long Duration Credit Fund (RPLCX) and SEI Institutional Investments Trust Long Duration Fund (LDRAX) have volatilities of 2.67% and 2.66%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RPLCXLDRAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.67%

2.66%

+0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.64%

5.70%

-0.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.84%

8.08%

-0.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.65%

12.54%

-0.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.60%

11.40%

-0.80%

RPLCX vs. LDRAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RPLCX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than LDRAX's 0.14% expense ratio.


Dividends

RPLCX vs. LDRAX - Dividend Comparison

RPLCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.36%, more than LDRAX's 5.15% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LDRAX
SEI Institutional Investments Trust Long Duration Fund
5.15%5.04%4.62%3.42%3.23%4.30%12.32%8.60%4.80%4.46%6.21%9.23%
RPLCX
T. Rowe Price Institutional Long Duration Credit Fund
5.36%5.32%5.17%4.15%3.54%6.09%7.16%13.58%4.33%4.07%3.79%4.70%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, RPLCX and LDRAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

RPLCX has higher volatility (2.67%) compared to LDRAX (2.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RPLCX dropped -35.21% vs LDRAX's -37.23%.

RPLCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.04 vs 0.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RPLCX and LDRAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer