PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RPLCX vs. RPIFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RPLCX vs. RPIFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Institutional Long Duration Credit Fund (RPLCX) and T. Rowe Price Institutional Floating Rate Fund (RPIFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RPLCX achieves a 0.77% return, which is significantly lower than RPIFX's 1.48% return. Over the past 10 years, RPLCX has underperformed RPIFX with an annualized return of 2.22%, while RPIFX has yielded a comparatively higher 4.83% annualized return.


RPLCX

1D
0.00%
1M
1.00%
YTD
0.77%
6M
0.71%
1Y
8.81%
3Y*
3.95%
5Y*
-2.22%
10Y*
2.22%

RPIFX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.46%
YTD
1.48%
6M
2.31%
1Y
5.84%
3Y*
7.85%
5Y*
5.32%
10Y*
4.83%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RPLCX vs. RPIFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RPLCX
T. Rowe Price Institutional Long Duration Credit Fund
0.77%7.65%-1.84%9.05%-27.00%-0.19%16.73%23.72%-6.27%11.03%
RPIFX
T. Rowe Price Institutional Floating Rate Fund
1.48%6.71%8.47%10.13%-1.96%4.67%2.42%8.82%0.39%3.78%

Correlation

The correlation between RPLCX and RPIFX is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.25

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2014

0.14

The correlation between RPLCX and RPIFX shifts across timeframes, from 0.14 (all time) to 0.25 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RPLCX vs. RPIFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RPLCX
RPLCX Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
RPLCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RPLCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
RPLCX Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
RPLCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
RPLCX Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

RPIFX
RPIFX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
RPIFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RPIFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
RPIFX Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
RPIFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
RPIFX Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RPLCX vs. RPIFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Institutional Long Duration Credit Fund (RPLCX) and T. Rowe Price Institutional Floating Rate Fund (RPIFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RPLCXRPIFXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.04

2.48

-1.45

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.56

6.01

-4.45

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.97

-0.79

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.61

4.59

-2.98

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.48

17.04

-12.56

RPLCX vs. RPIFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RPLCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.04, which is lower than the RPIFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RPLCX and RPIFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RPLCXRPIFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.04

2.48

-1.45

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.19

1.94

-2.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.21

1.28

-1.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.35

1.30

-0.94

Drawdowns

RPLCX vs. RPIFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RPLCX drawdown since its inception was -35.21%, which is greater than RPIFX's maximum drawdown of -25.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RPLCX and RPIFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RPLCXRPIFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.21%

-25.10%

-10.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.19%

-1.44%

-3.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.32%

-2.28%

-11.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.21%

-5.90%

-29.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.21%

-19.67%

-15.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.87%

0.00%

-16.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.12%

-1.34%

-8.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.87%

0.39%

+1.48%

Volatility

RPLCX vs. RPIFX - Volatility Comparison

T. Rowe Price Institutional Long Duration Credit Fund (RPLCX) has a higher volatility of 2.67% compared to T. Rowe Price Institutional Floating Rate Fund (RPIFX) at 0.56%. This indicates that RPLCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RPIFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RPLCXRPIFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.67%

0.56%

+2.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.64%

1.80%

+3.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.84%

2.37%

+5.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.65%

2.75%

+8.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.60%

3.80%

+6.80%

RPLCX vs. RPIFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RPLCX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than RPIFX's 0.57% expense ratio.


Dividends

RPLCX vs. RPIFX - Dividend Comparison

RPLCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.36%, less than RPIFX's 6.99% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RPIFX
T. Rowe Price Institutional Floating Rate Fund
6.99%7.22%7.77%6.53%4.12%3.94%4.29%5.12%5.16%4.32%4.31%4.45%
RPLCX
T. Rowe Price Institutional Long Duration Credit Fund
5.36%5.32%5.17%4.15%3.54%6.09%7.16%13.58%4.33%4.07%3.79%4.70%

Frequently Asked Questions


RPLCX and RPIFX have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RPLCX has higher volatility (2.67%) compared to RPIFX (0.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RPLCX dropped -35.21% vs RPIFX's -25.10%.

RPIFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs 1.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RPLCX and RPIFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer