RPLCX vs. TBCIX
Compare and contrast key facts about T. Rowe Price Institutional Long Duration Credit Fund (RPLCX) and T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund I Class (TBCIX).
RPLCX is managed by T. Rowe Price. It was launched on Jun 2, 2013. TBCIX is managed by T. Rowe Price.
Performance
RPLCX vs. TBCIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RPLCX vs. TBCIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RPLCX T. Rowe Price Institutional Long Duration Credit Fund | -1.66% | 7.65% | -1.84% | 9.05% | -27.00% | -0.19% | 16.73% | 23.72% | -6.27% | 11.03% |
TBCIX T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund I Class | -11.20% | 18.94% | 48.73% | 49.61% | -38.48% | 18.30% | 34.90% | 30.30% | 2.13% | 36.68% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RPLCX achieves a -1.66% return, which is significantly higher than TBCIX's -11.20% return. Over the past 10 years, RPLCX has underperformed TBCIX with an annualized return of 2.29%, while TBCIX has yielded a comparatively higher 16.10% annualized return.
RPLCX
- 1D
- 0.54%
- 1M
- -3.14%
- YTD
- -1.66%
- 6M
- -1.77%
- 1Y
- 2.65%
- 3Y*
- 2.30%
- 5Y*
- -2.33%
- 10Y*
- 2.29%
TBCIX
- 1D
- 3.90%
- 1M
- -5.46%
- YTD
- -11.20%
- 6M
- -9.94%
- 1Y
- 15.19%
- 3Y*
- 26.37%
- 5Y*
- 10.79%
- 10Y*
- 16.10%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RPLCX vs. TBCIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
RPLCX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than TBCIX's 0.56% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RPLCX vs. TBCIX — Risk / Return Rank
RPLCX
TBCIX
RPLCX vs. TBCIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Institutional Long Duration Credit Fund (RPLCX) and T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund I Class (TBCIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RPLCX | TBCIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.37 | 0.72 | -0.35 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.56 | 1.21 | -0.64 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.17 | -0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.70 | 0.78 | -0.07 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.80 | 2.71 | -0.91 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RPLCX | TBCIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 | 0.72 | -0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.20 | 0.45 | -0.65 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.22 | 0.71 | -0.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.34 | 0.68 | -0.35 |
Correlation
The correlation between RPLCX and TBCIX is 0.03, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
RPLCX vs. TBCIX - Dividend Comparison
RPLCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.98%, less than TBCIX's 5.86% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RPLCX T. Rowe Price Institutional Long Duration Credit Fund | 4.98% | 5.32% | 5.17% | 4.15% | 3.54% | 6.09% | 7.16% | 13.58% | 4.33% | 4.07% | 3.79% | 4.70% |
TBCIX T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund I Class | 5.86% | 5.20% | 18.28% | 3.47% | 5.84% | 10.03% | 1.18% | 0.59% | 2.50% | 3.05% | 0.81% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
RPLCX vs. TBCIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RPLCX drawdown since its inception was -35.21%, smaller than the maximum TBCIX drawdown of -43.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RPLCX and TBCIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RPLCX | TBCIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.21% | -43.26% | +8.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.80% | -16.96% | +11.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.21% | -43.26% | +8.05% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.21% | -43.26% | +8.05% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.88% | -13.72% | -5.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.02% | -8.15% | -1.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.27% | 4.86% | -2.59% |
Volatility
RPLCX vs. TBCIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for T. Rowe Price Institutional Long Duration Credit Fund (RPLCX) is 3.35%, while T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund I Class (TBCIX) has a volatility of 7.01%. This indicates that RPLCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TBCIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RPLCX | TBCIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.35% | 7.01% | -3.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.21% | 12.40% | -7.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.79% | 22.77% | -13.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.64% | 23.94% | -12.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.59% | 22.73% | -12.14% |