PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RPIHX vs. PHYSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RPIHX vs. PHYSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Global High Income Bond Fund (RPIHX) and PIA High Yield Fund (PHYSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RPIHX achieves a 1.90% return, which is significantly higher than PHYSX's 1.05% return. Over the past 10 years, RPIHX has outperformed PHYSX with an annualized return of 6.58%, while PHYSX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.08% annualized return.


RPIHX

1D
0.12%
1M
-0.69%
6M
1.25%
YTD
1.90%
1Y
5.48%
3Y*
12.39%
5Y*
6.29%
10Y*
6.58%
ALL TIME*
7.31%

PHYSX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.07%
6M
0.29%
YTD
1.05%
1Y
1.82%
3Y*
6.12%
5Y*
3.36%
10Y*
5.08%
ALL TIME*
7.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

RPIHX vs. PHYSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RPIHX
T. Rowe Price Global High Income Bond Fund
1.90%11.06%14.81%20.60%-13.09%3.08%5.89%14.90%-1.76%8.71%
PHYSX
PIA High Yield Fund
1.05%1.82%10.33%16.17%-11.70%7.36%8.03%11.06%-2.77%8.04%

Correlation

The correlation between RPIHX and PHYSX is 0.67, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.70

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016

0.68

The correlation between RPIHX and PHYSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RPIHX vs. PHYSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RPIHX
RPIHX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
RPIHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RPIHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
RPIHX Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
RPIHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
RPIHX Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

PHYSX
PHYSX Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
PHYSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PHYSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
PHYSX Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
PHYSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
PHYSX Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RPIHX vs. PHYSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Global High Income Bond Fund (RPIHX) and PIA High Yield Fund (PHYSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RPIHXPHYSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.43

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.08

+0.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.89

0.32

+1.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.48

0.96

+7.53

RPIHX vs. PHYSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RPIHX Sharpe Ratio is 1.81, which is higher than the PHYSX Sharpe Ratio of 0.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RPIHX and PHYSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RPIHX vs. PHYSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RPIHX drawdown since its inception was -23.77%, roughly equal to the maximum PHYSX drawdown of -24.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RPIHX and PHYSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RPIHXPHYSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.77%

-24.10%

+0.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.91%

-3.82%

+0.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.27%

-6.11%

+2.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.25%

-13.99%

-5.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.77%

-19.86%

-3.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.80%

-0.29%

-0.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.56%

-1.87%

-0.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.65%

1.30%

-0.65%

Volatility

RPIHX vs. PHYSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for T. Rowe Price Global High Income Bond Fund (RPIHX) is 0.44%, while PIA High Yield Fund (PHYSX) has a volatility of 0.55%. This indicates that RPIHX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PHYSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RPIHXPHYSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.44%

0.55%

-0.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.36%

2.63%

-0.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.07%

3.27%

-0.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.52%

4.07%

+0.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.37%

4.08%

+1.29%

RPIHX vs. PHYSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RPIHX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than PHYSX's 0.86% expense ratio.


Dividends

RPIHX vs. PHYSX - Dividend Comparison

RPIHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.78%, more than PHYSX's 6.66% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PHYSX
PIA High Yield Fund
6.66%8.44%7.66%7.12%7.60%6.14%6.31%6.76%6.51%6.37%6.10%6.40%
RPIHX
T. Rowe Price Global High Income Bond Fund
6.78%8.08%12.15%11.87%8.56%5.42%5.37%6.43%7.34%6.29%6.20%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


RPIHX and PHYSX have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PHYSX has higher volatility (0.55%) compared to RPIHX (0.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RPIHX dropped -23.77% vs PHYSX's -24.10%.

RPIHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs 0.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RPIHX and PHYSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer