RPHS vs. MDIV

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

RPHS (Regents Park Hedged Market Strategy ETF) and MDIV (First Trust Multi-Asset Diversified Income Index Fund) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. RPHS is actively managed, while MDIV is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, RPHS returned 13.58%/yr vs 12.22%/yr for MDIV. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RPHS charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.73%/yr for MDIV.

Performance

RPHS vs. MDIV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Regents Park Hedged Market Strategy ETF (RPHS) and First Trust Multi-Asset Diversified Income Index Fund (MDIV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RPHS achieves a 3.99% return, which is significantly lower than MDIV's 8.23% return.

RPHS

• 1D: -0.87%
• 1M: -1.07%
• YTD: 3.99%
• 6M: 3.78%
• 1Y: 15.90%
• 3Y*: 13.58%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MDIV

• 1D: 0.70%
• 1M: -0.63%
• YTD: 8.23%
• 6M: 8.54%
• 1Y: 11.46%
• 3Y*: 12.22%
• 5Y*: 5.93%
• 10Y*: 4.86%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RPHS vs. MDIV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
RPHS Regents Park Hedged Market Strategy ETF	3.99%	11.74%	17.84%	11.36%	-15.25%
MDIV First Trust Multi-Asset Diversified Income Index Fund	8.23%	3.77%	10.05%	11.50%	-7.09%

Correlation

The correlation between RPHS and MDIV is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.33
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.41
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 31, 2022	0.40

Return for Risk

RPHS vs. MDIV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RPHS

RPHS Risk / Return Rank: 46
RPHS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
RPHS Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
RPHS Omega Ratio Rank: 44
RPHS Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
RPHS Martin Ratio Rank: 51

MDIV

MDIV Risk / Return Rank: 57
MDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
MDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
MDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 49
MDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
MDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 56

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RPHS vs. MDIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Regents Park Hedged Market Strategy ETF (RPHS) and First Trust Multi-Asset Diversified Income Index Fund (MDIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RPHS	MDIV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.46	1.69	-0.23
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.06	2.46	-0.40
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.30	-0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.04	3.39	-1.35
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.95	9.38	-1.43

RPHS vs. MDIV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RPHS Sharpe Ratio is 1.46, which is comparable to the MDIV Sharpe Ratio of 1.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RPHS and MDIV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RPHS vs. MDIV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RPHS drawdown since its inception was -16.51%, smaller than the maximum MDIV drawdown of -48.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RPHS and MDIV.

Drawdown Indicators

	RPHS	MDIV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.51%	-48.50%	+31.99%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.81%	-3.39%	-4.42%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-10.84%	-9.62%	-1.22%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-13.02%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-48.50%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.06%	-1.05%	-2.01%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.27%	-4.57%	-1.70%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.00%	1.22%	+0.78%

Volatility

RPHS vs. MDIV - Volatility Comparison

Regents Park Hedged Market Strategy ETF (RPHS) has a higher volatility of 3.89% compared to First Trust Multi-Asset Diversified Income Index Fund (MDIV) at 2.17%. This indicates that RPHS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MDIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RPHS	MDIV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.89%	2.17%	+1.72%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.84%	4.51%	+3.33%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.93%	6.81%	+4.12%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.45%	10.94%	+0.51%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.45%	15.22%	-3.77%

RPHS vs. MDIV - Expense Ratio Comparison

RPHS has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than MDIV's 0.73% expense ratio.

Dividends

RPHS vs. MDIV - Dividend Comparison

RPHS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.70%, more than MDIV's 6.35% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MDIV First Trust Multi-Asset Diversified Income Index Fund	6.35%	6.51%	6.40%	6.08%	6.71%	5.30%	6.00%	5.90%	6.76%	6.04%	6.35%	7.38%
RPHS Regents Park Hedged Market Strategy ETF	10.70%	11.13%	3.68%	5.23%	1.29%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RPHS and MDIV in my portfolio?

RPHS and MDIV have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RPHS or MDIV?

RPHS has higher volatility (3.89%) compared to MDIV (2.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RPHS dropped -16.51% vs MDIV's -48.50%.

Which ETF is better, RPHS or MDIV?

On 3-year performance, RPHS leads with 13.58% vs 12.22% for MDIV. On fees, MDIV is cheaper at 0.73% per year. On volatility, MDIV has been the lower-risk option at 2.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RPHS or MDIV?

Over the 3-year period, RPHS has performed better with a 13.58% return vs 12.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RPHS or MDIV?

MDIV is cheaper with a 0.73% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for RPHS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RPHS or MDIV?

RPHS has the higher dividend yield at 10.70%, compared with 6.35% for MDIV.

What is the main difference between RPHS and MDIV?

They also come from different issuers: Regents Park and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for RPHS and 0.73% for MDIV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MDIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.69 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.