RPHS vs. THRV
RPHS (Regents Park Hedged Market Strategy ETF) and THRV (Prospera Income ETF) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.60 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. RPHS charges 0.75%/yr vs 1.80%/yr for THRV.
Performance
RPHS vs. THRV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RPHS achieves a 5.19% return, which is significantly higher than THRV's 2.02% return.
RPHS
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.05%
- 6M
- 4.63%
- YTD
- 5.19%
- 1Y
- 13.74%
- 3Y*
- 13.17%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 6.44%
THRV
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- 6M
- 1.11%
- YTD
- 2.02%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $158.10K | $111.61K | $97.25K |
RPHS vs. THRV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
RPHS Regents Park Hedged Market Strategy ETF | 5.19% | 2.16% |
THRV Prospera Income ETF | 2.02% | 0.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between RPHS and THRV is 0.60, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2025 | 0.60 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RPHS vs. THRV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Regents Park Hedged Market Strategy ETF (RPHS) and Prospera Income ETF (THRV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RPHS | THRV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.68 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.35 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RPHS vs. THRV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RPHS drawdown since its inception was -16.51%, which is greater than THRV's maximum drawdown of -1.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RPHS and THRV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RPHS | THRV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.51% | -1.50% | -15.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.81% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.84% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.94% | -0.39% | -1.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.21% | -0.42% | -5.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.07% | — | — |
Volatility
RPHS vs. THRV - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RPHS | THRV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.90% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.69% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.57% | 2.88% | +7.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.39% | 2.88% | +8.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.39% | 2.88% | +8.51% |
RPHS vs. THRV - Expense Ratio Comparison
RPHS has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than THRV's 1.80% expense ratio.
Dividends
RPHS vs. THRV - Dividend Comparison
RPHS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while THRV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.09%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RPHS Regents Park Hedged Market Strategy ETF | 34.69% | 11.13% | 3.68% | 5.23% | 1.29% |
THRV Prospera Income ETF | 6.09% | 1.67% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RPHS and THRV have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, RPHS is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
RPHS is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.80% for THRV.
RPHS has the higher dividend yield at 34.69%, compared with 6.09% for THRV.
They also come from different issuers: Regents Park and Prospera. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for RPHS and 1.80% for THRV.
Find the right allocation for RPHS and THRV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer