RPHS vs. CTAP

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

RPHS (Regents Park Hedged Market Strategy ETF) and CTAP (Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RPHS charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for CTAP.

Performance

RPHS vs. CTAP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Regents Park Hedged Market Strategy ETF (RPHS) and Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF (CTAP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RPHS achieves a 5.19% return, which is significantly lower than CTAP's 7.96% return.

RPHS

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.50%
• 6M: 3.92%
• YTD: 5.19%
• 1Y: 13.63%
• 3Y*: 13.17%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CTAP

• 1D: 2.15%
• 1M: -4.45%
• 6M: 3.36%
• YTD: 7.96%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RPHS vs. CTAP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
RPHS Regents Park Hedged Market Strategy ETF	5.19%	-0.04%
CTAP Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF	7.96%	2.22%

Correlation

The correlation between RPHS and CTAP is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2025	0.29

Return for Risk

RPHS vs. CTAP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RPHS

RPHS Risk / Return Rank: 45
RPHS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
RPHS Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
RPHS Omega Ratio Rank: 44
RPHS Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
RPHS Martin Ratio Rank: 49

CTAP

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RPHS vs. CTAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Regents Park Hedged Market Strategy ETF (RPHS) and Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF (CTAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RPHS	CTAP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.29	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.85	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.75	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.63	—	—

Drawdowns

RPHS vs. CTAP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RPHS drawdown since its inception was -16.51%, smaller than the maximum CTAP drawdown of -20.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RPHS and CTAP.

Drawdown Indicators

	RPHS	CTAP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.51%	-20.48%	+3.97%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.81%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-10.84%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.94%	-15.43%	+13.49%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.21%	-4.40%	-1.81%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.06%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	RPHS	CTAP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.00%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.73%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.62%	24.47%	-13.85%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.40%	24.47%	-13.07%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.40%	24.47%	-13.07%

RPHS vs. CTAP - Expense Ratio Comparison

RPHS has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than CTAP's 0.10% expense ratio.

Dividends

RPHS vs. CTAP - Dividend Comparison

RPHS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 34.69%, more than CTAP's 1.84% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
CTAP Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF	1.84%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
RPHS Regents Park Hedged Market Strategy ETF	34.69%	11.13%	3.68%	5.23%	1.29%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RPHS and CTAP in my portfolio?

RPHS and CTAP have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, RPHS or CTAP?

On fees, CTAP is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, RPHS or CTAP?

CTAP is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for RPHS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RPHS or CTAP?

RPHS has the higher dividend yield at 34.69%, compared with 1.84% for CTAP.

What is the main difference between RPHS and CTAP?

They also come from different issuers: Regents Park and Simplify. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for RPHS and 0.10% for CTAP.