RPHS vs. CTAP

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Regents Park Hedged Market Strategy ETF (RPHS) and Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF (CTAP).

RPHS and CTAP are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. RPHS is an actively managed fund by Regents Park. It was launched on Mar 30, 2022. CTAP is an actively managed fund by Simplify. It was launched on Dec 8, 2025.

Performance

RPHS vs. CTAP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Regents Park Hedged Market Strategy ETF (RPHS) and Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF (CTAP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

RPHS vs. CTAP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
RPHS Regents Park Hedged Market Strategy ETF	-4.78%	0.44%
CTAP Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF	5.36%	2.44%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RPHS achieves a -4.78% return, which is significantly lower than CTAP's 5.36% return.

RPHS

• 1D: 2.04%
• 1M: -4.49%
• YTD: -4.78%
• 6M: -2.81%
• 1Y: 10.44%
• 3Y*: 11.72%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CTAP

• 1D: 1.18%
• 1M: -5.40%
• YTD: 5.36%
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RPHS vs. CTAP - Expense Ratio Comparison

RPHS has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than CTAP's 0.10% expense ratio.

RPHS

Regents Park Hedged Market Strategy ETF

CTAP

Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF

Return for Risk

RPHS vs. CTAP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RPHS

RPHS Risk / Return Rank: 49
RPHS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
RPHS Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
RPHS Omega Ratio Rank: 42
RPHS Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
RPHS Martin Ratio Rank: 53

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RPHS vs. CTAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Regents Park Hedged Market Strategy ETF (RPHS) and Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF (CTAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RPHS	CTAP	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.93	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.34	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.33	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	5.27	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RPHS	CTAP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.93	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.41	1.31	-0.90

Correlation

The correlation between RPHS and CTAP is 0.53, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

RPHS vs. CTAP - Dividend Comparison

RPHS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.69%, more than CTAP's 0.75% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
RPHS Regents Park Hedged Market Strategy ETF	11.69%	11.13%	3.68%	5.23%	1.29%
CTAP Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF	0.75%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

RPHS vs. CTAP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RPHS drawdown since its inception was -15.77%, which is greater than CTAP's maximum drawdown of -9.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RPHS and CTAP.

Drawdown Indicators

	RPHS	CTAP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.77%	-9.02%	-6.75%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.81%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.93%	-5.64%	-0.29%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.18%	-2.15%	-4.03%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.97%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	RPHS	CTAP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.39%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.78%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.28%	22.12%	-10.84%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.44%	22.12%	-10.68%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.44%	22.12%	-10.68%