RPG vs. SGRT

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

RPG (Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF) and SGRT (SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. RPG is passively managed, while SGRT is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. RPG charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for SGRT.

Performance

RPG vs. SGRT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF (RPG) and SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF (SGRT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RPG achieves a 31.51% return, which is significantly lower than SGRT's 51.46% return.

RPG

• 1D: 0.16%
• 1M: 11.54%
• YTD: 31.51%
• 6M: 32.14%
• 1Y: 41.04%
• 3Y*: 28.39%
• 5Y*: 13.02%
• 10Y*: 14.81%

SGRT

• 1D: 0.03%
• 1M: 14.68%
• YTD: 51.46%
• 6M: 56.17%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RPG vs. SGRT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
RPG Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF	31.51%	1.49%
SGRT SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF	51.46%	25.25%

Correlation

The correlation between RPG and SGRT is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 2025	0.80

Return for Risk

RPG vs. SGRT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RPG

RPG Risk / Return Rank: 65
RPG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
RPG Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
RPG Omega Ratio Rank: 58
RPG Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
RPG Martin Ratio Rank: 76

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RPG vs. SGRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF (RPG) and SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF (SGRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RPG	SGRT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.09	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.82	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.72	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.56	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RPG	SGRT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.09	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.56	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.65	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.54	3.81	-3.26

Drawdowns

RPG vs. SGRT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RPG drawdown since its inception was -53.27%, which is greater than SGRT's maximum drawdown of -17.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RPG and SGRT.

Drawdown Indicators

	RPG	SGRT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-53.27%	-17.87%	-35.40%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.08%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.75%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-35.59%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.58%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.84%	-3.11%	-5.73%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.83%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	RPG	SGRT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.43%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.26%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.73%	33.41%	-13.68%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.44%	33.41%	-9.97%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.70%	33.41%	-10.71%

RPG vs. SGRT - Expense Ratio Comparison

RPG has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than SGRT's 0.59% expense ratio.

Dividends

RPG vs. SGRT - Dividend Comparison

RPG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.17%, more than SGRT's 0.11% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
RPG Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF	0.17%	0.24%	0.25%	1.44%	0.74%	0.00%	0.46%	0.83%	0.47%	0.56%	0.43%	0.73%
SGRT SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF	0.11%	0.16%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RPG and SGRT in my portfolio?

RPG and SGRT have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, RPG or SGRT?

On fees, RPG is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, RPG or SGRT?

RPG is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for SGRT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RPG or SGRT?

RPG has the higher dividend yield at 0.17%, compared with 0.11% for SGRT.

What is the main difference between RPG and SGRT?

Their fees differ too: 0.35% for RPG and 0.59% for SGRT.