PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RPG vs. DLN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RPG vs. DLN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF (RPG) and WisdomTree US LargeCap Dividend ETF (DLN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RPG achieves a 31.51% return, which is significantly higher than DLN's 9.93% return. Over the past 10 years, RPG has outperformed DLN with an annualized return of 14.81%, while DLN has yielded a comparatively lower 12.68% annualized return.


RPG

1D
0.16%
1M
11.54%
YTD
31.51%
6M
32.14%
1Y
41.04%
3Y*
28.39%
5Y*
13.02%
10Y*
14.81%

DLN

1D
-0.51%
1M
2.93%
YTD
9.93%
6M
9.96%
1Y
22.38%
3Y*
18.35%
5Y*
12.22%
10Y*
12.68%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RPG vs. DLN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RPG
Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF
31.51%13.41%28.23%8.04%-27.55%29.40%29.34%28.34%-4.53%26.20%
DLN
WisdomTree US LargeCap Dividend ETF
9.93%15.53%19.66%9.95%-3.78%25.60%4.59%28.91%-5.82%18.22%

Correlation

The correlation between RPG and DLN is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 19, 2006

0.80

The correlation between RPG and DLN shifts across timeframes, from 0.66 (1 year) to 0.80 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

RPG vs. DLN - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
RPG
DLN

Technology

39.6%
20.1%

Industrials

17.6%
7.9%

Consumer Cyclical

17.1%
5.0%

Communication Services

8.8%
7.8%

Healthcare

7.0%
12.6%

Financial Services

5.2%
18.0%

Basic Materials

1.5%
1.0%

Energy

1.4%
8.5%

Utilities

1.1%
5.9%

Real Estate

1.1%
4.0%

Consumer Defensive

1.1%
9.3%

Technology

RPG
39.6%
DLN
20.1%

Industrials

RPG
17.6%
DLN
7.9%

Consumer Cyclical

RPG
17.1%
DLN
5.0%

Communication Services

RPG
8.8%
DLN
7.8%

Healthcare

RPG
7.0%
DLN
12.6%

Financial Services

RPG
5.2%
DLN
18.0%

Basic Materials

RPG
1.5%
DLN
1.0%

Energy

RPG
1.4%
DLN
8.5%

Utilities

RPG
1.1%
DLN
5.9%

Real Estate

RPG
1.1%
DLN
4.0%

Consumer Defensive

RPG
1.1%
DLN
9.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RPG vs. DLN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RPG
RPG Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
RPG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RPG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
RPG Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
RPG Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
RPG Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

DLN
DLN Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
DLN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DLN Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
DLN Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
DLN Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
DLN Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RPG vs. DLN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF (RPG) and WisdomTree US LargeCap Dividend ETF (DLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RPGDLNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.83

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.46

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.72

3.69

+0.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.56

15.59

-1.03

RPG vs. DLN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RPG Sharpe Ratio is 2.09, which is comparable to the DLN Sharpe Ratio of 2.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RPG and DLN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RPGDLNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.09

2.53

-0.44

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

0.93

-0.37

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

0.79

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

0.53

+0.01

Drawdowns

RPG vs. DLN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RPG drawdown since its inception was -53.27%, smaller than the maximum DLN drawdown of -57.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RPG and DLN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RPGDLNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.27%

-57.84%

+4.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.08%

-6.10%

-4.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.75%

-13.71%

-11.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.59%

-16.26%

-19.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.58%

-35.82%

-0.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.51%

+0.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.84%

-7.52%

-1.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.83%

1.44%

+1.39%

Volatility

RPG vs. DLN - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF (RPG) has a higher volatility of 6.43% compared to WisdomTree US LargeCap Dividend ETF (DLN) at 2.17%. This indicates that RPG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DLN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RPGDLNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.43%

2.17%

+4.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.26%

6.77%

+9.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.73%

8.87%

+10.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.44%

13.26%

+10.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.70%

16.16%

+6.54%

RPG vs. DLN - Expense Ratio Comparison

RPG has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than DLN's 0.28% expense ratio.


Dividends

RPG vs. DLN - Dividend Comparison

RPG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.17%, less than DLN's 1.79% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DLN
WisdomTree US LargeCap Dividend ETF
1.79%1.90%2.00%2.43%2.53%2.01%2.66%2.51%2.90%2.33%2.64%2.80%
RPG
Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF
0.17%0.24%0.25%1.44%0.74%0.00%0.46%0.83%0.47%0.56%0.43%0.73%

Frequently Asked Questions


RPG and DLN have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RPG has higher volatility (6.43%) compared to DLN (2.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RPG dropped -53.27% vs DLN's -57.84%.

On 10-year performance, RPG leads with 14.81% vs 12.68% for DLN. On fees, DLN is cheaper at 0.28% per year. On volatility, DLN has been the lower-risk option at 2.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, RPG has performed better with a 14.81% return vs 12.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DLN is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for RPG.

DLN has the higher dividend yield at 1.79%, compared with 0.17% for RPG.

RPG tracks S&P 500/Citigroup Pure Growth Index, while DLN tracks WisdomTree LargeCap Dividend Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for RPG and 0.28% for DLN.

DLN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 2.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RPG and DLN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer