RPG vs. DBE
RPG (Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF) and DBE (Invesco DB Energy Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - RPG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the S&P 500/Citigroup Pure Growth Index, while DBE is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the DBIQ Optimum Yield Energy Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, RPG returned 14.81%/yr vs 12.03%/yr for DBE. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RPG charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for DBE.
Performance
RPG vs. DBE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RPG achieves a 31.51% return, which is significantly lower than DBE's 83.68% return. Over the past 10 years, RPG has outperformed DBE with an annualized return of 14.81%, while DBE has yielded a comparatively lower 12.03% annualized return.
RPG
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- 11.54%
- YTD
- 31.51%
- 6M
- 32.14%
- 1Y
- 41.04%
- 3Y*
- 28.39%
- 5Y*
- 13.02%
- 10Y*
- 14.81%
DBE
- 1D
- 2.33%
- 1M
- -5.45%
- YTD
- 83.68%
- 6M
- 74.95%
- 1Y
- 84.41%
- 3Y*
- 23.42%
- 5Y*
- 19.66%
- 10Y*
- 12.03%
RPG vs. DBE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RPG Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF | 31.51% | 13.41% | 28.23% | 8.04% | -27.55% | 29.40% | 29.34% | 28.34% | -4.53% | 26.20% |
DBE Invesco DB Energy Fund | 83.68% | -2.17% | 2.96% | -12.14% | 33.77% | 57.56% | -25.91% | 19.72% | -12.95% | 5.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between RPG and DBE is -0.30, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.30 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.00 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 8, 2007 | 0.27 |
The correlation between RPG and DBE shifts across timeframes, from -0.30 (1 year) to 0.27 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RPG vs. DBE — Risk / Return Rank
RPG
DBE
RPG vs. DBE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF (RPG) and Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RPG | DBE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.34 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.40 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.72 | 5.89 | -2.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.56 | 11.53 | +3.03 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RPG | DBE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.09 | 2.43 | -0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 | 0.67 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.65 | 0.43 | +0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.54 | 0.09 | +0.45 |
Drawdowns
RPG vs. DBE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RPG drawdown since its inception was -53.27%, smaller than the maximum DBE drawdown of -86.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RPG and DBE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RPG | DBE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.27% | -86.69% | +33.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.08% | -14.41% | +3.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.75% | -23.89% | -0.86% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.59% | -38.74% | +3.15% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.58% | -60.84% | +24.26% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -30.27% | +30.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.84% | -57.31% | +48.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.83% | 7.35% | -4.52% |
Volatility
RPG vs. DBE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF (RPG) is 6.43%, while Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE) has a volatility of 12.95%. This indicates that RPG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RPG | DBE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.43% | 12.95% | -6.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.26% | 30.86% | -14.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.73% | 34.97% | -15.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.44% | 29.39% | -5.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.70% | 28.33% | -5.63% |
RPG vs. DBE - Expense Ratio Comparison
RPG has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than DBE's 0.78% expense ratio.
Dividends
RPG vs. DBE - Dividend Comparison
RPG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.17%, less than DBE's 2.10% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBE Invesco DB Energy Fund | 2.10% | 3.86% | 6.32% | 3.87% | 0.75% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.79% | 1.67% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RPG Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF | 0.17% | 0.24% | 0.25% | 1.44% | 0.74% | 0.00% | 0.46% | 0.83% | 0.47% | 0.56% | 0.43% | 0.73% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RPG and DBE have a correlation of -0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DBE has higher volatility (12.95%) compared to RPG (6.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RPG dropped -53.27% vs DBE's -86.69%.
On 10-year performance, RPG leads with 14.81% vs 12.03% for DBE. On fees, RPG is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, RPG has been the lower-risk option at 6.43%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, RPG has performed better with a 14.81% return vs 12.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RPG is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for DBE.
DBE has the higher dividend yield at 2.10%, compared with 0.17% for RPG.
RPG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while DBE is Oil & Gas. RPG tracks S&P 500/Citigroup Pure Growth Index, while DBE tracks DBIQ Optimum Yield Energy Index. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for RPG and 0.78% for DBE.
DBE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs 2.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RPG and DBE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer