PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RPFGX vs. VTCLX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RPFGX vs. VTCLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Davis Financial Fund (RPFGX) and Vanguard Tax-Managed Capital Appreciation Fund Admiral Shares (VTCLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RPFGX achieves a -7.21% return, which is significantly lower than VTCLX's 11.07% return. Over the past 10 years, RPFGX has underperformed VTCLX with an annualized return of 11.85%, while VTCLX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.44% annualized return.


RPFGX

1D
-0.91%
1M
-2.95%
YTD
-7.21%
6M
-1.99%
1Y
10.74%
3Y*
22.30%
5Y*
10.26%
10Y*
11.85%

VTCLX

1D
0.30%
1M
4.98%
YTD
11.07%
6M
11.40%
1Y
28.78%
3Y*
22.12%
5Y*
13.32%
10Y*
15.44%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RPFGX vs. VTCLX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RPFGX
Davis Financial Fund
-7.21%29.28%29.54%15.60%-8.91%31.45%-5.87%26.51%-11.74%19.24%
VTCLX
Vanguard Tax-Managed Capital Appreciation Fund Admiral Shares
11.07%17.44%23.76%26.62%-19.07%26.87%21.08%31.47%-4.98%22.40%

Correlation

The correlation between RPFGX and VTCLX is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 13, 2001

0.82

The correlation between RPFGX and VTCLX shifts across timeframes, from 0.65 (3 years) to 0.82 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RPFGX vs. VTCLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RPFGX
RPFGX Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
RPFGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RPFGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
RPFGX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
RPFGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
RPFGX Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

VTCLX
VTCLX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
VTCLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTCLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTCLX Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
VTCLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTCLX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RPFGX vs. VTCLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Davis Financial Fund (RPFGX) and Vanguard Tax-Managed Capital Appreciation Fund Admiral Shares (VTCLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RPFGXVTCLXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.77

2.45

-1.68

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.14

3.34

-2.20

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.44

-0.30

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.77

3.33

-2.56

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.14

15.51

-13.37

RPFGX vs. VTCLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RPFGX Sharpe Ratio is 0.77, which is lower than the VTCLX Sharpe Ratio of 2.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RPFGX and VTCLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RPFGXVTCLXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

2.45

-1.68

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

0.78

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

0.85

-0.31

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.57

0.53

+0.04

Drawdowns

RPFGX vs. VTCLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RPFGX drawdown since its inception was -67.11%, which is greater than VTCLX's maximum drawdown of -55.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RPFGX and VTCLX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RPFGXVTCLXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.11%

-55.18%

-11.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.54%

-8.79%

-5.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.30%

-19.01%

+2.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.86%

-24.98%

-1.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.24%

-34.56%

-10.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.10%

0.00%

-10.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.86%

-7.57%

-2.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.26%

1.89%

+3.37%

Volatility

RPFGX vs. VTCLX - Volatility Comparison

Davis Financial Fund (RPFGX) has a higher volatility of 3.79% compared to Vanguard Tax-Managed Capital Appreciation Fund Admiral Shares (VTCLX) at 2.86%. This indicates that RPFGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTCLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RPFGXVTCLXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.79%

2.86%

+0.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.48%

9.10%

+2.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.85%

12.03%

+2.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.29%

17.22%

+2.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.31%

18.28%

+4.03%

RPFGX vs. VTCLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RPFGX has a 0.94% expense ratio, which is higher than VTCLX's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

RPFGX vs. VTCLX - Dividend Comparison

RPFGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.29%, more than VTCLX's 0.85% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RPFGX
Davis Financial Fund
4.29%3.98%4.19%6.96%3.41%6.60%5.60%7.96%8.93%2.32%1.68%2.26%
VTCLX
Vanguard Tax-Managed Capital Appreciation Fund Admiral Shares
0.85%0.93%1.04%1.24%1.47%1.04%1.32%1.52%1.83%1.57%1.76%1.69%

Frequently Asked Questions


RPFGX and VTCLX have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RPFGX has higher volatility (3.79%) compared to VTCLX (2.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RPFGX dropped -67.11% vs VTCLX's -55.18%.

VTCLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.45 vs 0.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RPFGX and VTCLX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer