PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RPFGX vs. VTCLX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RPFGX vs. VTCLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Davis Financial Fund (RPFGX) and Vanguard Tax-Managed Capital Appreciation Fund Admiral Shares (VTCLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RPFGX achieves a 3.41% return, which is significantly lower than VTCLX's 9.93% return. Over the past 10 years, RPFGX has underperformed VTCLX with an annualized return of 13.19%, while VTCLX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.01% annualized return.


RPFGX

1D
-0.07%
1M
0.96%
6M
3.71%
YTD
3.41%
1Y
19.12%
3Y*
22.79%
5Y*
13.82%
10Y*
13.19%
ALL TIME*
12.29%

VTCLX

1D
0.60%
1M
-0.20%
6M
7.78%
YTD
9.93%
1Y
21.13%
3Y*
18.88%
5Y*
12.06%
10Y*
15.01%
ALL TIME*
10.11%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

RPFGX vs. VTCLX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RPFGX
Davis Financial Fund
3.41%29.28%29.54%15.60%-8.91%31.45%-5.87%26.51%-11.74%19.24%
VTCLX
Vanguard Tax-Managed Capital Appreciation Fund Admiral Shares
9.93%17.44%23.76%26.62%-19.07%26.87%21.08%31.47%-4.98%22.40%

Correlation

The correlation between RPFGX and VTCLX is 0.58, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.63

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.70

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 12, 2001

0.82

Over the past year, the correlation between RPFGX and VTCLX has dropped to 0.58 - well below their long-term average of 0.82, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RPFGX vs. VTCLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RPFGX
RPFGX Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
RPFGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RPFGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
RPFGX Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
RPFGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
RPFGX Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

VTCLX
VTCLX Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
VTCLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTCLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTCLX Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
VTCLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTCLX Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RPFGX vs. VTCLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Davis Financial Fund (RPFGX) and Vanguard Tax-Managed Capital Appreciation Fund Admiral Shares (VTCLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RPFGXVTCLXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.26

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.18

2.19

-1.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.07

9.51

-6.44

RPFGX vs. VTCLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RPFGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.14, which is comparable to the VTCLX Sharpe Ratio of 1.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RPFGX and VTCLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RPFGX vs. VTCLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RPFGX drawdown since its inception was -67.11%, which is greater than VTCLX's maximum drawdown of -55.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RPFGX and VTCLX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RPFGXVTCLXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.11%

-55.18%

-11.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.54%

-8.79%

-5.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.30%

-19.01%

+2.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.86%

-24.98%

-1.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.24%

-34.56%

-10.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.33%

-1.24%

-0.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.83%

-7.53%

-2.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.58%

2.02%

+3.56%

Volatility

RPFGX vs. VTCLX - Volatility Comparison

Davis Financial Fund (RPFGX) has a higher volatility of 3.97% compared to Vanguard Tax-Managed Capital Appreciation Fund Admiral Shares (VTCLX) at 3.47%. This indicates that RPFGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTCLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RPFGXVTCLXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.97%

3.47%

+0.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.73%

10.17%

+1.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.13%

12.98%

+2.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.09%

17.32%

+1.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.21%

18.27%

+3.94%

RPFGX vs. VTCLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RPFGX has a 0.94% expense ratio, which is higher than VTCLX's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

RPFGX vs. VTCLX - Dividend Comparison

RPFGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.85%, more than VTCLX's 0.91% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RPFGX
Davis Financial Fund
3.85%3.98%4.19%6.96%3.41%6.60%5.60%7.96%8.93%2.32%1.68%2.26%
VTCLX
Vanguard Tax-Managed Capital Appreciation Fund Admiral Shares
0.91%0.93%1.04%1.24%1.47%1.04%1.32%1.52%1.83%1.57%1.76%1.69%

Frequently Asked Questions


RPFGX and VTCLX have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RPFGX has higher volatility (3.97%) compared to VTCLX (3.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RPFGX dropped -67.11% vs VTCLX's -55.18%.

VTCLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.48 vs 1.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RPFGX and VTCLX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer