RPFGX vs. VTCLX
Compare and contrast key facts about Davis Financial Fund (RPFGX) and Vanguard Tax-Managed Capital Appreciation Fund Admiral Shares (VTCLX).
RPFGX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on May 1, 1991. VTCLX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Sep 6, 1994.
Performance
RPFGX vs. VTCLX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RPFGX vs. VTCLX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RPFGX Davis Financial Fund | -8.77% | 29.28% | 29.54% | 15.60% | -8.91% | 31.45% | -5.87% | 26.51% | -11.74% | 19.24% |
VTCLX Vanguard Tax-Managed Capital Appreciation Fund Admiral Shares | -4.05% | 17.44% | 23.76% | 26.62% | -19.07% | 26.87% | 21.08% | 31.47% | -4.98% | 22.40% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RPFGX achieves a -8.77% return, which is significantly lower than VTCLX's -4.05% return. Over the past 10 years, RPFGX has underperformed VTCLX with an annualized return of 12.09%, while VTCLX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.99% annualized return.
RPFGX
- 1D
- 2.67%
- 1M
- -4.54%
- YTD
- -8.77%
- 6M
- -0.81%
- 1Y
- 14.10%
- 3Y*
- 22.32%
- 5Y*
- 12.12%
- 10Y*
- 12.09%
VTCLX
- 1D
- 2.93%
- 1M
- -5.03%
- YTD
- -4.05%
- 6M
- -1.91%
- 1Y
- 17.51%
- 3Y*
- 17.97%
- 5Y*
- 11.05%
- 10Y*
- 13.99%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RPFGX vs. VTCLX - Expense Ratio Comparison
RPFGX has a 0.94% expense ratio, which is higher than VTCLX's 0.09% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RPFGX vs. VTCLX — Risk / Return Rank
RPFGX
VTCLX
RPFGX vs. VTCLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Davis Financial Fund (RPFGX) and Vanguard Tax-Managed Capital Appreciation Fund Admiral Shares (VTCLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RPFGX | VTCLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.73 | 0.98 | -0.25 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.07 | 1.50 | -0.43 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.23 | -0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.01 | 1.52 | -0.51 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.23 | 7.35 | -4.12 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RPFGX | VTCLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 | 0.98 | -0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.63 | 0.64 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.54 | 0.77 | -0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.57 | 0.50 | +0.07 |
Correlation
The correlation between RPFGX and VTCLX is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
RPFGX vs. VTCLX - Dividend Comparison
RPFGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.36%, more than VTCLX's 0.98% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RPFGX Davis Financial Fund | 4.36% | 3.98% | 4.19% | 6.96% | 3.41% | 6.60% | 5.60% | 7.96% | 8.93% | 2.32% | 1.68% | 2.26% |
VTCLX Vanguard Tax-Managed Capital Appreciation Fund Admiral Shares | 0.98% | 0.93% | 1.04% | 1.24% | 1.47% | 1.04% | 1.32% | 1.52% | 1.83% | 1.57% | 1.76% | 1.69% |
Drawdowns
RPFGX vs. VTCLX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RPFGX drawdown since its inception was -67.11%, which is greater than VTCLX's maximum drawdown of -55.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RPFGX and VTCLX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RPFGX | VTCLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.11% | -55.18% | -11.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.54% | -12.20% | -2.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.86% | -24.98% | -1.88% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.24% | -34.56% | -10.68% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.61% | -6.12% | -5.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.87% | -7.61% | -2.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.55% | 2.53% | +2.02% |
Volatility
RPFGX vs. VTCLX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Davis Financial Fund (RPFGX) is 5.06%, while Vanguard Tax-Managed Capital Appreciation Fund Admiral Shares (VTCLX) has a volatility of 5.42%. This indicates that RPFGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VTCLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RPFGX | VTCLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.06% | 5.42% | -0.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.48% | 9.68% | +1.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.12% | 18.43% | +0.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.28% | 17.23% | +2.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.29% | 18.26% | +4.03% |