VTCLX vs. IWO
VTCLX (Vanguard Tax-Managed Capital Appreciation Fund Admiral Shares) and IWO (iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF) are both funds - VTCLX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 Index, while IWO is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Russell 2000 Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VTCLX returned 15.64%/yr vs 12.01%/yr for IWO. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VTCLX charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.24%/yr for IWO.
Performance
VTCLX vs. IWO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VTCLX achieves a 9.59% return, which is significantly lower than IWO's 20.20% return. Over the past 10 years, VTCLX has outperformed IWO with an annualized return of 15.64%, while IWO has yielded a comparatively lower 12.01% annualized return.
VTCLX
- 1D
- -0.40%
- 1M
- 0.38%
- YTD
- 9.59%
- 6M
- 8.51%
- 1Y
- 25.09%
- 3Y*
- 20.96%
- 5Y*
- 12.76%
- 10Y*
- 15.64%
IWO
- 1D
- -1.57%
- 1M
- 4.24%
- YTD
- 20.20%
- 6M
- 16.81%
- 1Y
- 39.68%
- 3Y*
- 19.15%
- 5Y*
- 5.15%
- 10Y*
- 12.01%
VTCLX vs. IWO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VTCLX Vanguard Tax-Managed Capital Appreciation Fund Admiral Shares | 9.59% | 17.44% | 23.76% | 26.62% | -19.07% | 26.87% | 21.08% | 31.47% | -4.98% | 22.40% |
IWO iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF | 20.20% | 12.90% | 15.04% | 18.51% | -26.27% | 2.54% | 34.68% | 28.48% | -9.43% | 22.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between VTCLX and IWO is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 12, 2001 | 0.87 |
The correlation between VTCLX and IWO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.
VTCLX vs. IWO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VTCLX
IWO
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Technology
VTCLX
IWO
Financial Services
VTCLX
IWO
Communication Services
VTCLX
IWO
Consumer Cyclical
VTCLX
IWO
Industrials
VTCLX
IWO
Healthcare
VTCLX
IWO
Consumer Defensive
VTCLX
IWO
Energy
VTCLX
IWO
Utilities
VTCLX
IWO
Basic Materials
VTCLX
IWO
Real Estate
VTCLX
IWO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VTCLX vs. IWO — Risk / Return Rank
VTCLX
IWO
VTCLX vs. IWO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Tax-Managed Capital Appreciation Fund Admiral Shares (VTCLX) and iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF (IWO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VTCLX | IWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.39 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.29 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.00 | 2.68 | +0.32 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.52 | 9.57 | +3.95 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VTCLX vs. IWO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VTCLX drawdown since its inception was -55.18%, smaller than the maximum IWO drawdown of -60.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTCLX and IWO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VTCLX | IWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.18% | -60.11% | +4.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.79% | -14.87% | +6.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.01% | -28.57% | +9.56% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.98% | -40.51% | +15.53% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.56% | -42.02% | +7.46% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.55% | -1.57% | +0.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.55% | -16.68% | +9.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.95% | 4.16% | -2.21% |
Volatility
VTCLX vs. IWO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard Tax-Managed Capital Appreciation Fund Admiral Shares (VTCLX) is 4.68%, while iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF (IWO) has a volatility of 7.84%. This indicates that VTCLX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IWO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VTCLX | IWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.68% | 7.84% | -3.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.93% | 16.69% | -6.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.64% | 22.20% | -9.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.31% | 24.65% | -7.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.32% | 24.18% | -5.86% |
VTCLX vs. IWO - Expense Ratio Comparison
VTCLX has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than IWO's 0.24% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VTCLX vs. IWO - Dividend Comparison
VTCLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.91%, more than IWO's 0.42% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWO iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF | 0.42% | 0.56% | 0.80% | 0.73% | 0.73% | 0.32% | 0.44% | 0.71% | 0.76% | 0.73% | 0.97% | 0.89% |
VTCLX Vanguard Tax-Managed Capital Appreciation Fund Admiral Shares | 0.91% | 0.93% | 1.04% | 1.24% | 1.47% | 1.04% | 1.32% | 1.52% | 1.83% | 1.57% | 1.76% | 1.69% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VTCLX and IWO have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IWO has higher volatility (7.84%) compared to VTCLX (4.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VTCLX dropped -55.18% vs IWO's -60.11%.
VTCLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 1.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VTCLX and IWO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer