PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RPFGX vs. PRISX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RPFGX vs. PRISX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Davis Financial Fund (RPFGX) and T. Rowe Price Financial Services Fund (PRISX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RPFGX achieves a -6.26% return, which is significantly lower than PRISX's -2.49% return. Over the past 10 years, RPFGX has underperformed PRISX with an annualized return of 11.97%, while PRISX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.49% annualized return.


RPFGX

1D
1.02%
1M
-0.61%
YTD
-6.26%
6M
-2.13%
1Y
11.41%
3Y*
22.72%
5Y*
10.48%
10Y*
11.97%

PRISX

1D
0.11%
1M
0.26%
YTD
-2.49%
6M
1.19%
1Y
10.16%
3Y*
22.69%
5Y*
10.16%
10Y*
14.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RPFGX vs. PRISX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RPFGX
Davis Financial Fund
-6.26%29.28%29.54%15.60%-8.91%31.45%-5.87%26.51%-11.74%19.24%
PRISX
T. Rowe Price Financial Services Fund
-2.49%18.75%30.87%14.95%-10.99%37.83%5.65%32.84%-10.12%19.17%

Correlation

The correlation between RPFGX and PRISX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 1997

0.93

The correlation between RPFGX and PRISX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RPFGX vs. PRISX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RPFGX
RPFGX Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
RPFGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RPFGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
RPFGX Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
RPFGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
RPFGX Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank

PRISX
PRISX Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
PRISX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRISX Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRISX Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
PRISX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRISX Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RPFGX vs. PRISX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Davis Financial Fund (RPFGX) and T. Rowe Price Financial Services Fund (PRISX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RPFGXPRISXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.13

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.82

0.77

+0.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.25

2.17

+0.08

RPFGX vs. PRISX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RPFGX Sharpe Ratio is 0.80, which is comparable to the PRISX Sharpe Ratio of 0.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RPFGX and PRISX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RPFGXPRISXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

0.68

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

0.50

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

0.67

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.57

0.43

+0.14

Drawdowns

RPFGX vs. PRISX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RPFGX drawdown since its inception was -67.11%, roughly equal to the maximum PRISX drawdown of -67.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RPFGX and PRISX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RPFGXPRISXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.11%

-67.34%

+0.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.54%

-13.92%

-0.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.30%

-18.06%

+1.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.86%

-26.95%

+0.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.24%

-42.86%

-2.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.18%

-5.56%

-3.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.86%

-11.25%

+1.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.29%

4.93%

+0.36%

Volatility

RPFGX vs. PRISX - Volatility Comparison

Davis Financial Fund (RPFGX) has a higher volatility of 3.95% compared to T. Rowe Price Financial Services Fund (PRISX) at 3.21%. This indicates that RPFGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PRISX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RPFGXPRISXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.95%

3.21%

+0.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.52%

11.83%

-0.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.85%

15.67%

-0.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.30%

20.24%

-0.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.31%

21.86%

+0.45%

RPFGX vs. PRISX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RPFGX has a 0.94% expense ratio, which is higher than PRISX's 0.88% expense ratio.


Dividends

RPFGX vs. PRISX - Dividend Comparison

RPFGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.24%, less than PRISX's 7.04% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PRISX
T. Rowe Price Financial Services Fund
7.04%6.87%8.74%2.00%2.08%3.00%10.22%6.14%11.97%4.68%1.00%3.86%
RPFGX
Davis Financial Fund
4.24%3.98%4.19%6.96%3.41%6.60%5.60%7.96%8.93%2.32%1.68%2.26%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, RPFGX and PRISX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

RPFGX has higher volatility (3.95%) compared to PRISX (3.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RPFGX dropped -67.11% vs PRISX's -67.34%.

RPFGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.80 vs 0.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RPFGX and PRISX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer