RPF.TO vs. RGPM.NEO
RPF.TO (RBC Canadian Preferred Share ETF) and RGPM.NEO (RBC Global Precious Metals Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - RPF.TO is a Preferred Stock fund actively managed by RBC, while RGPM.NEO is a Precious Metals fund actively managed by RBC. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, RPF.TO returned 19.93%/yr vs 40.42%/yr for RGPM.NEO. Their 0.04 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. RPF.TO charges 0.58%/yr vs 1.02%/yr for RGPM.NEO.
Performance
RPF.TO vs. RGPM.NEO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RPF.TO achieves a 9.10% return, which is significantly higher than RGPM.NEO's -8.72% return.
RPF.TO
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 2.27%
- 6M
- 8.52%
- YTD
- 9.10%
- 1Y
- 16.80%
- 3Y*
- 19.93%
- 5Y*
- 7.85%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 7.90%
RGPM.NEO
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -6.73%
- 6M
- -14.75%
- YTD
- -8.72%
- 1Y
- 46.97%
- 3Y*
- 40.42%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 36.96%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
RGPM.NEO RBC Global Precious Metals Fund | CA$90.23K | CA$221.18K | CA$277.75K |
| CA$201.24K | CA$184.61K | CA$187.73K |
RPF.TO vs. RGPM.NEO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
RPF.TO RBC Canadian Preferred Share ETF | 9.10% | 19.23% | 28.54% | -2.07% |
RGPM.NEO RBC Global Precious Metals Fund | -8.72% | 143.89% | 36.75% | -3.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between RPF.TO and RGPM.NEO is 0.09, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.09 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.05 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 3, 2023 | 0.04 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RPF.TO vs. RGPM.NEO — Risk / Return Rank
RPF.TO
RGPM.NEO
RPF.TO vs. RGPM.NEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RBC Canadian Preferred Share ETF (RPF.TO) and RBC Global Precious Metals Fund (RGPM.NEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RPF.TO | RGPM.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.67 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.88 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.74 | 1.21 | +0.53 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.56 | 1.33 | +6.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 41.29 | 2.97 | +38.33 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RPF.TO vs. RGPM.NEO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RPF.TO drawdown since its inception was -45.68%, which is greater than RGPM.NEO's maximum drawdown of -36.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RPF.TO and RGPM.NEO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RPF.TO | RGPM.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.68% | -36.67% | -9.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.11% | -36.67% | +34.56% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.71% | -36.67% | +27.96% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.37% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.04% | -31.42% | +31.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.50% | -9.44% | +1.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.39% | 16.37% | -15.98% |
Volatility
RPF.TO vs. RGPM.NEO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for RBC Canadian Preferred Share ETF (RPF.TO) is 1.33%, while RBC Global Precious Metals Fund (RGPM.NEO) has a volatility of 10.97%. This indicates that RPF.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RGPM.NEO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RPF.TO | RGPM.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.33% | 10.97% | -9.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.95% | 35.42% | -32.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.34% | 46.62% | -42.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.50% | 33.78% | -25.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.25% | 33.78% | -21.53% |
RPF.TO vs. RGPM.NEO - Expense Ratio Comparison
RPF.TO has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than RGPM.NEO's 1.02% expense ratio.
Dividends
RPF.TO vs. RGPM.NEO - Dividend Comparison
RPF.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.87%, while RGPM.NEO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RGPM.NEO RBC Global Precious Metals Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RPF.TO RBC Canadian Preferred Share ETF | 4.87% | 5.08% | 5.48% | 6.17% | 5.65% | 4.22% | 5.24% | 5.07% | 4.52% | 3.95% | 1.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RPF.TO and RGPM.NEO have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, RPF.TO is cheaper at 0.58% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
RPF.TO is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 1.02% for RGPM.NEO.
RPF.TO is categorized as Preferred Stock, while RGPM.NEO is Precious Metals. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for RPF.TO and 1.02% for RGPM.NEO.
Find the right allocation for RPF.TO and RGPM.NEO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer