PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ROUS vs. USFR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ROUS vs. USFR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF (ROUS) and WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund (USFR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ROUS achieves a 16.38% return, which is significantly higher than USFR's 1.78% return. Over the past 10 years, ROUS has outperformed USFR with an annualized return of 13.10%, while USFR has yielded a comparatively lower 2.43% annualized return.


ROUS

1D
0.54%
1M
1.79%
YTD
16.38%
6M
15.03%
1Y
30.10%
3Y*
20.23%
5Y*
12.99%
10Y*
13.10%

USFR

1D
0.00%
1M
0.29%
YTD
1.78%
6M
1.89%
1Y
3.97%
3Y*
4.72%
5Y*
3.70%
10Y*
2.43%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ROUS vs. USFR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ROUS
Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF
16.38%15.21%17.61%15.05%-9.65%27.33%6.61%23.94%-9.59%22.88%
USFR
WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund
1.78%4.23%5.47%5.18%1.98%-0.03%0.56%2.02%2.01%1.03%

Correlation

The correlation between ROUS and USFR is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.02

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.01

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 26, 2015

0.01

The correlation between ROUS and USFR shifts across timeframes, from -0.12 (1 year) to 0.01 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ROUS vs. USFR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ROUS
ROUS Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
ROUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ROUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
ROUS Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
ROUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
ROUS Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

USFR
USFR Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
USFR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USFR Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
USFR Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
USFR Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
USFR Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ROUS vs. USFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF (ROUS) and WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund (USFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ROUSUSFRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-12.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-46.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

13.24

-11.79

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.06

200.29

-195.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

20.49

775.73

-755.25

ROUS vs. USFR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ROUS Sharpe Ratio is 2.59, which is lower than the USFR Sharpe Ratio of 14.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ROUS and USFR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ROUS vs. USFR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ROUS drawdown since its inception was -35.51%, which is greater than USFR's maximum drawdown of -1.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROUS and USFR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ROUSUSFRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.51%

-1.36%

-34.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.97%

-0.02%

-5.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.81%

-0.06%

-15.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.91%

-0.18%

-18.73%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.51%

-0.80%

-34.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.02%

0.00%

-1.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.22%

-0.15%

-4.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.47%

0.01%

+1.46%

Volatility

ROUS vs. USFR - Volatility Comparison

Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF (ROUS) has a higher volatility of 3.89% compared to WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund (USFR) at 0.08%. This indicates that ROUS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USFR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ROUSUSFRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.89%

0.08%

+3.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.91%

0.19%

+8.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.68%

0.27%

+11.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.43%

0.40%

+14.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.98%

0.78%

+16.20%

ROUS vs. USFR - Expense Ratio Comparison

ROUS has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than USFR's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ROUS vs. USFR - Dividend Comparison

ROUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.32%, less than USFR's 3.91% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ROUS
Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF
1.32%1.52%1.62%1.91%1.88%1.38%2.01%2.12%1.89%1.54%1.97%1.62%
USFR
WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund
3.91%4.15%5.17%5.12%1.78%0.01%0.40%2.08%1.67%1.03%0.29%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ROUS and USFR have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ROUS has higher volatility (3.89%) compared to USFR (0.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ROUS dropped -35.51% vs USFR's -1.36%.

On 10-year performance, ROUS leads with 13.10% vs 2.43% for USFR. On fees, USFR is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, USFR has been the lower-risk option at 0.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, ROUS has performed better with a 13.10% return vs 2.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

USFR is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for ROUS.

USFR has the higher dividend yield at 3.91%, compared with 1.32% for ROUS.

ROUS is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while USFR is Government Bonds. ROUS tracks Hartford Multi-factor Large Cap Index, while USFR tracks Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Floating Rate Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: Hartford and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for ROUS and 0.15% for USFR.

USFR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (14.65 vs 2.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ROUS and USFR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer