ROUS vs. GRW

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ROUS (Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF) and GRW (TCW Durable Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. ROUS is passively managed, while GRW is actively managed. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ROUS charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for GRW.

Performance

ROUS vs. GRW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF (ROUS) and TCW Durable Growth ETF (GRW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

ROUS

• 1D: 0.01%
• 1M: 6.18%
• YTD: 16.55%
• 6M: 16.75%
• 1Y: 29.42%
• 3Y*: 20.87%
• 5Y*: 12.84%
• 10Y*: 13.01%

GRW

• 1D: -0.32%
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ROUS vs. GRW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
ROUS Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF	1.56%
GRW TCW Durable Growth ETF	1.29%

Correlation

The correlation between ROUS and GRW is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026	0.40

ROUS vs. GRW - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ROUS	GRW
Technology	33.2%	26.6%
Healthcare	10.7%	4.1%
Financial Services	10.6%	9.8%
Industrials	10.4%	38.1%
Consumer Cyclical	9.6%	8.3%
Communication Services	8.6%	9.1%
Consumer Defensive	5.8%	-
Utilities	3.8%	-
Energy	3.0%	-
Basic Materials	2.2%	4.0%
Real Estate	2.1%	-

Return for Risk

ROUS vs. GRW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ROUS

ROUS Risk / Return Rank: 83
ROUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
ROUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
ROUS Omega Ratio Rank: 76
ROUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
ROUS Martin Ratio Rank: 89

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ROUS vs. GRW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF (ROUS) and TCW Durable Growth ETF (GRW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ROUS	GRW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.60	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.67	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.46	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.95	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	20.38	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ROUS	GRW	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.60	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.90	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.77	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.67	14.00	-13.33

Drawdowns

ROUS vs. GRW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ROUS drawdown since its inception was -35.51%, which is greater than GRW's maximum drawdown of -0.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROUS and GRW.

Drawdown Indicators

	ROUS	GRW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.51%	-0.45%	-35.06%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.97%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.81%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.91%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.51%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.45%	+0.45%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.24%	-0.14%	-4.10%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.45%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ROUS	GRW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.54%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.50%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.37%	10.19%	+1.18%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.38%	10.19%	+4.19%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.96%	10.19%	+6.77%

ROUS vs. GRW - Expense Ratio Comparison

ROUS has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than GRW's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

ROUS vs. GRW - Dividend Comparison

ROUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.32%, while GRW has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GRW TCW Durable Growth ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
ROUS Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF	1.32%	1.52%	1.62%	1.91%	1.88%	1.38%	2.01%	2.12%	1.89%	1.54%	1.97%	1.62%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ROUS and GRW in my portfolio?

ROUS and GRW have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, ROUS or GRW?

On fees, ROUS is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ROUS or GRW?

ROUS is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for GRW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ROUS or GRW?

ROUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.32%, compared with 0.00% for GRW.

What is the main difference between ROUS and GRW?

They also come from different issuers: Hartford and TCW. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for ROUS and 0.75% for GRW.