CSL vs. EIRRX
CSL (Carlisle Companies Incorporated) is a stock, while EIRRX (Eaton Vance Short Duration Inflation-Protected Income Fund) is Inflation-Protected Bonds fund managed by Eaton Vance. Over the past 10 years, CSL returned 14.60%/yr vs 3.73%/yr for EIRRX. Their 0.11 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
CSL vs. EIRRX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CSL achieves a 13.20% return, which is significantly higher than EIRRX's 1.27% return. Over the past 10 years, CSL has outperformed EIRRX with an annualized return of 14.60%, while EIRRX has yielded a comparatively lower 3.73% annualized return.
CSL
- 1D
- -2.69%
- 1M
- -1.86%
- 6M
- 6.22%
- YTD
- 13.20%
- 1Y
- 3.38%
- 3Y*
- 10.15%
- 5Y*
- 13.44%
- 10Y*
- 14.60%
- ALL TIME*
- 15.13%
EIRRX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.20%
- 6M
- 0.77%
- YTD
- 1.27%
- 1Y
- 2.33%
- 3Y*
- 4.83%
- 5Y*
- 3.31%
- 10Y*
- 3.73%
- ALL TIME*
- 2.81%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $192.98M | $195.31M | $163.99M | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
CSL vs. EIRRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSL Carlisle Companies Incorporated | 13.20% | -12.26% | 19.14% | 34.26% | -4.08% | 60.64% | -1.96% | 63.10% | -10.31% | 4.51% |
EIRRX Eaton Vance Short Duration Inflation-Protected Income Fund | 1.27% | 4.63% | 5.65% | 6.33% | -3.08% | 7.84% | 5.25% | 5.60% | -0.15% | 1.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between CSL and EIRRX is 0.13, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.13 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.12 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.13 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 3, 2012 | 0.11 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CSL vs. EIRRX — Risk / Return Rank
CSL
EIRRX
CSL vs. EIRRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Carlisle Companies Incorporated (CSL) and Eaton Vance Short Duration Inflation-Protected Income Fund (EIRRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CSL | EIRRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.40 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.81 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.32 | -0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.11 | 2.75 | -2.64 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.18 | 8.19 | -8.01 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CSL vs. EIRRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSL drawdown since its inception was -64.56%, which is greater than EIRRX's maximum drawdown of -10.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSL and EIRRX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CSL | EIRRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.56% | -10.27% | -54.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.48% | -0.89% | -24.59% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -37.72% | -1.67% | -36.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.72% | -6.22% | -31.50% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.68% | -10.27% | -28.41% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.66% | -0.47% | -23.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.36% | -0.99% | -11.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.31% | 0.30% | +15.01% |
Volatility
CSL vs. EIRRX - Volatility Comparison
Carlisle Companies Incorporated (CSL) has a higher volatility of 15.99% compared to Eaton Vance Short Duration Inflation-Protected Income Fund (EIRRX) at 0.48%. This indicates that CSL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EIRRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CSL | EIRRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.99% | 0.48% | +15.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.09% | 1.36% | +28.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.89% | 1.66% | +38.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.93% | 2.84% | +29.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.23% | 2.77% | +27.46% |
Dividends
CSL vs. EIRRX - Dividend Comparison
CSL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.22%, less than EIRRX's 5.28% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSL Carlisle Companies Incorporated | 1.22% | 1.31% | 1.00% | 1.02% | 1.09% | 0.86% | 1.31% | 1.11% | 1.53% | 1.27% | 1.18% | 1.24% |
EIRRX Eaton Vance Short Duration Inflation-Protected Income Fund | 5.28% | 3.57% | 4.08% | 4.50% | 5.07% | 3.54% | 2.21% | 2.66% | 2.91% | 2.13% | 2.24% | 2.05% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CSL and EIRRX have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CSL has higher volatility (15.99%) compared to EIRRX (0.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CSL dropped -64.56% vs EIRRX's -10.27%.
EIRRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.47 vs 0.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CSL and EIRRX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer