RONB vs. HLAL
RONB (Baron First Principles ETF) and HLAL (Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. RONB is actively managed, while HLAL is passively managed. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RONB charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for HLAL.
Performance
RONB vs. HLAL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RONB achieves a -3.75% return, which is significantly lower than HLAL's 18.72% return.
RONB
- 1D
- -1.11%
- 1M
- 4.33%
- YTD
- -3.75%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HLAL
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- 9.45%
- YTD
- 18.72%
- 6M
- 17.75%
- 1Y
- 43.63%
- 3Y*
- 22.04%
- 5Y*
- 15.86%
- 10Y*
- —
RONB vs. HLAL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
RONB Baron First Principles ETF | -3.75% | -0.33% |
HLAL Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF | 18.72% | -0.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between RONB and HLAL is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2025 | 0.49 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RONB vs. HLAL — Risk / Return Rank
RONB
HLAL
RONB vs. HLAL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Baron First Principles ETF (RONB) and Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF (HLAL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RONB | HLAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 3.33 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.91 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.51 | 0.89 | -1.41 |
Drawdowns
RONB vs. HLAL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RONB drawdown since its inception was -13.08%, smaller than the maximum HLAL drawdown of -33.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RONB and HLAL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RONB | HLAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.08% | -33.57% | +20.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -10.20% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -21.67% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -23.18% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.80% | -0.07% | -5.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.33% | -5.00% | -1.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.20% | — |
Volatility
RONB vs. HLAL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RONB | HLAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.70% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 9.95% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.85% | 13.17% | +3.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.85% | 17.60% | -0.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.85% | 20.21% | -3.36% |
RONB vs. HLAL - Expense Ratio Comparison
RONB has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than HLAL's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
RONB vs. HLAL - Dividend Comparison
RONB has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HLAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.44%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HLAL Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF | 0.44% | 0.53% | 0.58% | 0.72% | 1.15% | 0.78% | 0.97% | 0.72% |
RONB Baron First Principles ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RONB and HLAL have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HLAL is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HLAL is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for RONB.
HLAL has the higher dividend yield at 0.44%, compared with 0.00% for RONB.
They also come from different issuers: Baron Capital and Wahed. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for RONB and 0.50% for HLAL.
Find the right allocation for RONB and HLAL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer