RONB vs. FMTM
RONB (Baron First Principles ETF) and FMTM (MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RONB is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Baron Capital, while FMTM is a Momentum fund. Both are actively managed. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RONB charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for FMTM.
Performance
RONB vs. FMTM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RONB achieves a -3.75% return, which is significantly lower than FMTM's 31.75% return.
RONB
- 1D
- -1.11%
- 1M
- 4.33%
- YTD
- -3.75%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FMTM
- 1D
- 0.50%
- 1M
- 6.28%
- YTD
- 31.75%
- 6M
- 34.74%
- 1Y
- 63.62%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RONB vs. FMTM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
RONB Baron First Principles ETF | -3.75% | -0.33% |
FMTM MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF | 31.75% | 1.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between RONB and FMTM is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2025 | 0.30 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RONB vs. FMTM — Risk / Return Rank
RONB
FMTM
RONB vs. FMTM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Baron First Principles ETF (RONB) and MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF (FMTM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RONB | FMTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.80 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.51 | 2.38 | -2.90 |
Drawdowns
RONB vs. FMTM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RONB drawdown since its inception was -13.08%, which is greater than FMTM's maximum drawdown of -12.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RONB and FMTM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RONB | FMTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.08% | -12.12% | -0.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -12.12% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.80% | 0.00% | -5.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.33% | -1.89% | -4.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.10% | — |
Volatility
RONB vs. FMTM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RONB | FMTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.52% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 17.83% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.85% | 22.82% | -5.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.85% | 22.94% | -6.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.85% | 22.94% | -6.09% |
RONB vs. FMTM - Expense Ratio Comparison
RONB has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than FMTM's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
RONB vs. FMTM - Dividend Comparison
RONB has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FMTM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.22%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
FMTM MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF | 0.22% | 0.30% |
RONB Baron First Principles ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RONB and FMTM have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FMTM is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FMTM is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for RONB.
FMTM has the higher dividend yield at 0.22%, compared with 0.00% for RONB.
RONB is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while FMTM is Momentum. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for RONB and 0.45% for FMTM.
Find the right allocation for RONB and FMTM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer