RONB vs. CCOR

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

RONB (Baron First Principles ETF) and CCOR (Core Alternative ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RONB charges 1.00%/yr vs 1.09%/yr for CCOR.

Performance

RONB vs. CCOR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Baron First Principles ETF (RONB) and Core Alternative ETF (CCOR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with RONB having a -3.75% return and CCOR slightly higher at -3.71%.

RONB

• 1D: -1.11%
• 1M: 4.33%
• YTD: -3.75%
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CCOR

• 1D: 0.30%
• 1M: -2.55%
• YTD: -3.71%
• 6M: -4.87%
• 1Y: -5.97%
• 3Y*: -2.34%
• 5Y*: -2.56%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RONB vs. CCOR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
RONB Baron First Principles ETF	-3.75%	-0.33%
CCOR Core Alternative ETF	-3.71%	-0.96%

Correlation

The correlation between RONB and CCOR is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2025	0.09

Return for Risk

RONB vs. CCOR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CCOR

CCOR Risk / Return Rank: 2
CCOR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
CCOR Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
CCOR Omega Ratio Rank: 2
CCOR Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
CCOR Martin Ratio Rank: 1

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RONB vs. CCOR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Baron First Principles ETF (RONB) and Core Alternative ETF (CCOR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RONB	CCOR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	-0.87	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	-0.23	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.51	0.11	-0.63

Drawdowns

RONB vs. CCOR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RONB drawdown since its inception was -13.08%, smaller than the maximum CCOR drawdown of -22.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RONB and CCOR.

Drawdown Indicators

	RONB	CCOR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.08%	-22.99%	+9.91%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-8.75%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-12.31%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-22.99%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.80%	-20.03%	+14.23%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.33%	-7.29%	+0.96%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	3.77%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	RONB	CCOR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	1.78%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	4.96%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.85%	6.93%	+9.92%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.85%	11.10%	+5.75%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.85%	10.75%	+6.10%

RONB vs. CCOR - Expense Ratio Comparison

RONB has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is lower than CCOR's 1.09% expense ratio.

Dividends

RONB vs. CCOR - Dividend Comparison

RONB has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CCOR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.11%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CCOR Core Alternative ETF	1.11%	1.07%	1.18%	1.21%	1.11%	1.02%	1.50%	0.73%	1.53%	0.89%
RONB Baron First Principles ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RONB and CCOR in my portfolio?

RONB and CCOR have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, RONB or CCOR?

On fees, RONB is cheaper at 1.00% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, RONB or CCOR?

RONB is cheaper with a 1.00% expense ratio, compared with 1.09% for CCOR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RONB or CCOR?

CCOR has the higher dividend yield at 1.11%, compared with 0.00% for RONB.

What is the main difference between RONB and CCOR?

They also come from different issuers: Baron Capital and Core Alternative Capital. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for RONB and 1.09% for CCOR.