PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ROM vs. SOXL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ROM vs. SOXL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra Technology (ROM) and Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF (SOXL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ROM achieves a 77.72% return, which is significantly lower than SOXL's 567.48% return. Over the past 10 years, ROM has underperformed SOXL with an annualized return of 42.70%, while SOXL has yielded a comparatively higher 65.39% annualized return.


ROM

1D
-2.01%
1M
45.36%
YTD
77.72%
6M
74.45%
1Y
152.07%
3Y*
59.24%
5Y*
31.70%
10Y*
42.70%

SOXL

1D
5.34%
1M
119.95%
YTD
567.48%
6M
502.28%
1Y
1,438.30%
3Y*
135.13%
5Y*
48.72%
10Y*
65.39%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ROM vs. SOXL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ROM
ProShares Ultra Technology
77.72%35.63%31.65%130.70%-63.86%77.75%80.42%102.10%-9.89%81.11%
SOXL
Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF
567.48%54.91%-12.31%226.98%-85.66%118.84%70.04%231.83%-39.07%141.71%

Correlation

The correlation between ROM and SOXL is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 12, 2010

0.85

The correlation between ROM and SOXL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

ROM vs. SOXL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ROM
SOXL

Technology

55.2%
100.0%

Financial Services

3.0%

-

Energy

0.1%

-

Industrials

0.0%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

ROM
55.2%
SOXL
100.0%

Financial Services

ROM
3.0%
SOXL

-

Energy

ROM
0.1%
SOXL

-

Industrials

ROM
0.0%
SOXL

-

Basic Materials

ROM

-

SOXL

-

Communication Services

ROM

-

SOXL

-

Consumer Cyclical

ROM

-

SOXL

-

Consumer Defensive

ROM

-

SOXL

-

Healthcare

ROM

-

SOXL

-

Real Estate

ROM

-

SOXL

-

Utilities

ROM

-

SOXL

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ROM vs. SOXL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ROM
ROM Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
ROM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ROM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
ROM Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
ROM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
ROM Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

SOXL
SOXL Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
SOXL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SOXL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
SOXL Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
SOXL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
SOXL Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ROM vs. SOXL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Technology (ROM) and Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF (SOXL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ROMSOXLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-10.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.72

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.73

33.47

-28.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.47

114.79

-100.32

ROM vs. SOXL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ROM Sharpe Ratio is 3.66, which is lower than the SOXL Sharpe Ratio of 14.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ROM and SOXL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ROMSOXLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.66

14.28

-10.62

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

0.46

+0.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

0.66

+0.20

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

0.52

+0.02

Drawdowns

ROM vs. SOXL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ROM drawdown since its inception was -83.36%, smaller than the maximum SOXL drawdown of -90.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROM and SOXL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ROMSOXLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-83.36%

-90.46%

+7.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-32.33%

-43.47%

+11.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-48.10%

-87.88%

+39.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-67.55%

-90.46%

+22.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-67.55%

-90.46%

+22.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.01%

0.00%

-2.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.88%

-35.01%

+14.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.55%

12.65%

-2.10%

Volatility

ROM vs. SOXL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares Ultra Technology (ROM) is 14.00%, while Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF (SOXL) has a volatility of 40.82%. This indicates that ROM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SOXL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ROMSOXLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.00%

40.82%

-26.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.37%

81.29%

-47.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

41.83%

102.11%

-60.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

51.63%

107.25%

-55.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

49.82%

99.04%

-49.22%

ROM vs. SOXL - Expense Ratio Comparison

ROM has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than SOXL's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

ROM vs. SOXL - Dividend Comparison

ROM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%, more than SOXL's 0.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ROM
ProShares Ultra Technology
0.14%0.24%0.21%0.01%0.00%0.00%0.05%0.16%0.30%0.08%0.20%0.12%
SOXL
Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF
0.03%0.34%1.18%0.51%1.07%0.04%0.05%0.38%1.30%0.09%4.84%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ROM and SOXL have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SOXL has higher volatility (40.82%) compared to ROM (14.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ROM dropped -83.36% vs SOXL's -90.46%.

On 10-year performance, SOXL leads with 65.39% vs 42.70% for ROM. On fees, SOXL is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, ROM has been the lower-risk option at 14.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SOXL has performed better with a 65.39% return vs 42.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SOXL is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for ROM.

ROM has the higher dividend yield at 0.14%, compared with 0.03% for SOXL.

ROM tracks Dow Jones U.S. Technology Index (200%), while SOXL tracks ICE Semiconductor Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for ROM and 0.75% for SOXL.

SOXL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (14.28 vs 3.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ROM and SOXL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer