ROM vs. SOXL
ROM (ProShares Ultra Technology) and SOXL (Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds - ROM tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Technology Index (200%) while SOXL tracks the ICE Semiconductor Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ROM returned 42.70%/yr vs 65.39%/yr for SOXL. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ROM charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for SOXL.
Performance
ROM vs. SOXL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ROM achieves a 77.72% return, which is significantly lower than SOXL's 567.48% return. Over the past 10 years, ROM has underperformed SOXL with an annualized return of 42.70%, while SOXL has yielded a comparatively higher 65.39% annualized return.
ROM
- 1D
- -2.01%
- 1M
- 45.36%
- YTD
- 77.72%
- 6M
- 74.45%
- 1Y
- 152.07%
- 3Y*
- 59.24%
- 5Y*
- 31.70%
- 10Y*
- 42.70%
SOXL
- 1D
- 5.34%
- 1M
- 119.95%
- YTD
- 567.48%
- 6M
- 502.28%
- 1Y
- 1,438.30%
- 3Y*
- 135.13%
- 5Y*
- 48.72%
- 10Y*
- 65.39%
ROM vs. SOXL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ROM ProShares Ultra Technology | 77.72% | 35.63% | 31.65% | 130.70% | -63.86% | 77.75% | 80.42% | 102.10% | -9.89% | 81.11% |
SOXL Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF | 567.48% | 54.91% | -12.31% | 226.98% | -85.66% | 118.84% | 70.04% | 231.83% | -39.07% | 141.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between ROM and SOXL is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 12, 2010 | 0.85 |
The correlation between ROM and SOXL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.
ROM vs. SOXL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ROM
SOXL
Technology
Financial Services
-
Energy
-
Industrials
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
ROM
SOXL
Financial Services
ROM
SOXL
-
Energy
ROM
SOXL
-
Industrials
ROM
SOXL
-
Basic Materials
ROM
-
SOXL
-
Communication Services
ROM
-
SOXL
-
Consumer Cyclical
ROM
-
SOXL
-
Consumer Defensive
ROM
-
SOXL
-
Healthcare
ROM
-
SOXL
-
Real Estate
ROM
-
SOXL
-
Utilities
ROM
-
SOXL
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ROM vs. SOXL — Risk / Return Rank
ROM
SOXL
ROM vs. SOXL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Technology (ROM) and Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF (SOXL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ROM | SOXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -10.62 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.49 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.72 | -0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.73 | 33.47 | -28.74 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.47 | 114.79 | -100.32 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ROM | SOXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.66 | 14.28 | -10.62 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.62 | 0.46 | +0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.86 | 0.66 | +0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.54 | 0.52 | +0.02 |
Drawdowns
ROM vs. SOXL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ROM drawdown since its inception was -83.36%, smaller than the maximum SOXL drawdown of -90.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROM and SOXL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ROM | SOXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -83.36% | -90.46% | +7.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -32.33% | -43.47% | +11.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -48.10% | -87.88% | +39.78% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -67.55% | -90.46% | +22.91% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -67.55% | -90.46% | +22.91% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.01% | 0.00% | -2.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.88% | -35.01% | +14.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.55% | 12.65% | -2.10% |
Volatility
ROM vs. SOXL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares Ultra Technology (ROM) is 14.00%, while Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF (SOXL) has a volatility of 40.82%. This indicates that ROM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SOXL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ROM | SOXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.00% | 40.82% | -26.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.37% | 81.29% | -47.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 41.83% | 102.11% | -60.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 51.63% | 107.25% | -55.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 49.82% | 99.04% | -49.22% |
ROM vs. SOXL - Expense Ratio Comparison
ROM has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than SOXL's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
ROM vs. SOXL - Dividend Comparison
ROM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%, more than SOXL's 0.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ROM ProShares Ultra Technology | 0.14% | 0.24% | 0.21% | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.05% | 0.16% | 0.30% | 0.08% | 0.20% | 0.12% |
SOXL Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF | 0.03% | 0.34% | 1.18% | 0.51% | 1.07% | 0.04% | 0.05% | 0.38% | 1.30% | 0.09% | 4.84% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ROM and SOXL have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SOXL has higher volatility (40.82%) compared to ROM (14.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ROM dropped -83.36% vs SOXL's -90.46%.
On 10-year performance, SOXL leads with 65.39% vs 42.70% for ROM. On fees, SOXL is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, ROM has been the lower-risk option at 14.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SOXL has performed better with a 65.39% return vs 42.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SOXL is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for ROM.
ROM has the higher dividend yield at 0.14%, compared with 0.03% for SOXL.
ROM tracks Dow Jones U.S. Technology Index (200%), while SOXL tracks ICE Semiconductor Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for ROM and 0.75% for SOXL.
SOXL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (14.28 vs 3.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ROM and SOXL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer